Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
ICCJ_139302 AI generated

Legal nature and contestability of anti-fraud inspector minutes under Emergency Ordinance No. 74/2013

Case Number ICCJ_139302
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Romania dismissed as inadmissible the referral for a preliminary ruling on a question of law submitted by a Bucharest Court of Appeal, meaning no substantive legal determination was issued on the merits of the dispute. The case involved a challenge regarding the legal nature and contestability of minutes (procese-verbale) drafted by anti-fraud inspectors under the Emergency Governmental Ordinance No. 74/2013, approved with amendments by Law No. 144/2014, which concerned measures for the reorganization of the National Agency for Fiscal Administration. The decisive legal basis for the dismissal was the procedural requirement for the admissibility of referrals to the specialized panel for resolving questions of law under Article 521 paragraph (3) of the Code of Civil Procedure.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă; Legal nature and contestability of anti-fraud inspector minutes under Emergency Ordinance No. 74/2013: The case involved a challenge regarding the legal nature and contestability of minutes (procese-verbale) drafted by anti-fraud inspectors under the Emergency Governmental Ordinance No. 74/2013, approved with amendments by Law No. 144/2014, which concerned measures for the reorganization of the National Agency for Fiscal Administration. The decisive legal basis for the dismissal was the procedural requirement for the admissibility of referrals to the specialized panel for resolving questions of law under Article 521 paragraph (3) of the Code of Civil Procedure.

Keywords

AI generated
Civil Procedure Code preliminary ruling procedure procedural issues fraud emergency ordinance fiscal law

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă
Cited in the dispositive to establish that the decision is binding on the referring court.
AI generated
Decizia nr. 2/2018
Anti-fraud inspection minutes not separately challengeable; referral for preliminary ruling rejected as inadmissible.
ICCJ_123246
Admissibility of referral for resolution of legal questions (chestiuni de drept)
ICCJ_230688
Inadmissibility of referrals for the resolution of legal questions due to procedural defects
Decizia nr. 81/2024
Admissibility of preliminary reference on mandatory written order for paying public-sector overtime
Decizia nr. 65/2021
Preliminary ruling referral dismissed as inadmissible absent genuine interpretive question on appellate court composition.

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă

Cited in the dispositive to establish that the decision is binding on the referring court.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

ROMÂNIA

ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE ŞI JUSTIŢIE

Completul pentru dezlegarea unor chestiuni de drept

Minuta deciziei nr.2 Dosar nr. 2351/1/2017

Şedinţa din 22 ianuarie 2018

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

DECIDE:

Respinge, ca inadmisibilă, sesizarea formulată de Tribunalul Bucureşti - Secția a V-a civilă, în dosarul nr. 26347/212/2015, pentru pronunțarea unei hotărâri prealabile pentru dezlegarea chestiunii de drept privind natura juridică a proceselor-verbale întocmite în baza Ordonanţei de urgență a Guvernului nr. 74/2013 privind unele măsuri pentru îmbunătăţirea şi reorganizarea activității Agenţiei Naţionale de Administrare Fiscală, precum şi pentru modificarea şi completarea unor acte normative, aprobată cu modificări şi completări prin Legea nr. 144/2014, de către inspectorii antifraudă şi posibilitatea contestării acestora.

Obligatorie, potrivit dispoziţiilor art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă.

Pronunţată în şedinţă publică astăzi, 22 ianuarie 2018.