Inclusion of diurna cash equivalents in net monthly income for child support calculation under Civil Code Articles 527(2) and 529(2)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe High Court of Cassation and Justice dismissed as inadmissible the reference for a preliminary ruling filed by the Botoșani Court of Appeal, meaning no binding interpretation was issued and the matter remains unresolved by the supreme court. The dispute concerned a family law issue within a maintenance case, specifically whether the cash equivalent of a daily allowance (diurnă) should be included in the calculation of a parent's net monthly income to determine child support obligations. The court rejected the reference, finding it did not meet the procedural requirements for a preliminary ruling under Article 521(3) of the Code of Civil Procedure, thereby leaving the interpretation of Articles 527(2) and 529(2) of the Civil Code to the lower courts in the absence of a unified position from the supreme court's panel for resolving questions of law.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedart. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă; Inclusion of diurna cash equivalents in net monthly income for child support calculation under Civil Code Articles 527(2) and 529(2): The dispute concerned a family law issue within a maintenance case, specifically whether the cash equivalent of a daily allowance (diurnă) should be included in the calculation of a parent's net monthly income to determine child support obligations. The court rejected the reference, finding it did not meet the procedural requirements for a preliminary ruling under Article 521(3) of the Code of Civil Procedure, thereby leaving the interpretation of Articles 527(2) and 529(2) of the Civil Code to the lower courts in the absence of a unified position from the supreme court's panel for resolving questions of law.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedRelated Decisions
AI generatedKey legal questions extracted by Legislator
AI generatedProcedural basis cited in the dispositive to establish the obligatory effect of the decision.
Full text
ROMÂNIA
ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE ŞI JUSTIŢIE
Completul pentru dezlegarea unor chestiuni de drept
Minuta deciziei nr. 85 Dosar nr. 1657/1/2017
Şedinţa din 20 noiembrie 2017
ÎN NUMELE LEGII
DECIDE:
Respinge, ca inadmisibilă, sesizarea formulată de Tribunalul Botoşani în dosarul nr. 9028/193/2016, în vederea pronunţării unei hotărâri prealabile cu privire la interpretarea şi aplicarea dispoziţiilor art. 527 alin. (2) şi art. 529 alin. (2) din Codul civil, respectiv dacă echivalentul valoric al diurnei se include în totalul veniturilor nete lunare în raport cu care se stabileşte pensia de întreţinere datorată de către părinte copilului.
Obligatorie, potrivit dispoziţiilor art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă.
Pronunţată în şedinţă publică, astăzi, 20 noiembrie 2017.