Legislator Case Law & Legislation
Decizia nr. 2457/2015 AI generated

Dismissal of mass appeal in administrative and fiscal litigation under Article 493(7) CPC

Case Number Decizia nr. 2457/2015
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice rejected the appeal as unfounded, thereby upholding and maintaining in force the lower court's judgment. The dispute involved a mass appeal filed by a large group of claimants and third-party intervenors against a first-instance administrative and fiscal decision regarding an unspecified subject matter, where the court examined the appeal under Article 493(7) of the Civil Procedure Code. The decisive legal basis was the procedural framework for judicial review under the newly reissued Civil Procedure Code, specifically the lack of merit in the grounds presented by the appellants to overturn the appellate court's finding.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 493 alin. (7) C. proc. civ, art. 493 alin. 6 din Noul C. proc. civ; Dismissal of mass appeal in administrative and fiscal litigation under Article 493(7) CPC: The dispute involved a mass appeal filed by a large group of claimants and third-party intervenors against a first-instance administrative and fiscal decision regarding an unspecified subject matter, where the court examined the appeal under Article 493(7) of the Civil Procedure Code. The decisive legal basis was the procedural framework for judicial review under the newly reissued Civil Procedure Code, specifically the lack of merit in the grounds presented by the appellants to overturn the appellate court's finding.

Keywords

AI generated
Civil Procedure Code administrative dismissal judicial review matter in dispute grounds for cassation review on the merits

Cited Legislation

AI generated
AI generated

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
art. 493 alin. (7) C. proc. civ.

Cited as the procedural basis for examining the appeal in the absence of the parties, which constitutes the procedural rule applied in the dispositive.

art. 493 alin. 6 din Noul C. proc. civ.

Cited to justify the absence of citation of the parties, a procedural rule applied in the dispositive.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Decizia nr. 2457/2015

S-a luat în examinare, în temeiul art. 493 alin. (7) C. proc. civ., republicat, recursul declarat de reclamanții A., B., C., D., E., F., G., H., I., J., K., L., M., N., O., P., Q., R., S., T., U., W., X., Y., Z., AA., BB., CC., DD., EE., FF., GG., HH., II., JJ., KK., LL., MM., NN., OO., PP., QQ., RR., SS., TT., UU., WW., XX., YY., ZZ., AAA., BBB., CCC., DDD., EEE., FFF., GGG., HHH., III., JJJ., KKK., LLL., MMM., NNN., OOO., PPP., QQQ., RRR., SSS., TTT., UUU., VVV., WWW., XXX., YYY., ZZZ., AAAA., BBBB., CCCC., DDDD., EEEE., FFFF., GGGG., HHHH., IIII., JJJJ., KKKK., LLLL., MMMM., NNNN, OOOO., PPPP., QQQQ., RRRR., SSSS., TTTT., UUUU. împotriva Sentinței nr. 145 din 20 ianuarie 2014 a Curții de Apel București, secția a VIII-a contencios administrativ și fiscal.

În lipsa părților, a căror citare nu a fost dispusă, conform art. 493 alin. 6 din Noul C. proc. civ.,

PENTRU ACESTE MOTIVE

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

D E C I D E

Respinge recursul declarat de reclamanții A., B., C., D., E., F., G., H., I., J., K., L., M., N., O., P., Q., R., S., T., U., W., X., Y., Z., AA., BB., CC., DD., EE., FF., GG., HH., II., JJ., KK., LL., MM., NN., OO., PP., QQ., RR., SS., TT., UU., WW., XX., YY., ZZ., AAA., BBB., CCC., DDD., EEE., FFF., GGG., HHH., III., JJJ., KKK., LLL., MMM., NNN., OOO., PPP., QQQ., RRR., SSS., TTT., UUU., VVV., WWW., XXX., YYY., ZZZ., AAAA., BBBB., CCCC., DDDD., EEEE., FFFF., GGGG., HHHH., IIII., JJJJ., KKKK., LLLL., MMMM., NNNN., OOOO., PPPP., QQQQ., RRRR., SSSS., TTTT., UUUU. și intervenienții în interes propriu VVVV., WWWW, XXXX, YYYY, ZZZZ, AAAAA, BBBBB, CCCCC și DDDDD împotriva Sentinței nr. 145 din 20 ianuarie 2014 a Curții de Apel București, secția a VIII-a contencios administrativ și fiscal, ca nefondat.

Definitivă.

Pronunțată în ședință publică, astăzi 11 iunie 2015.

Procesat de GGC - LM