Legislator Case Law & Legislation
ICCJ_135998 AI generated

Admissibility of preliminary reference on civil procedure under Art. 521(3) CPC

Case Number ICCJ_135998
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice rejected the preliminary reference submitted by the Covasna County Court as inadmissible, upholding the procedural determination that the referral did not meet statutory requirements, with the decision being mandatory under Article 521(3) of the Civil Procedure Code. The dispute involved a civil matter from a case initiated in 2013, where the lower court sought the Supreme Court's ruling on a question of law to resolve a legal uncertainty or inconsistency, but the petition failed to satisfy the admissibility criteria for preliminary references. The decisive legal basis was the application of Article 521(3) of the Romanian Civil Procedure Code, which governs the mandatory nature of the High Court's decisions on preliminary references and the strict procedural requirements for their admissibility.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă; Admissibility of preliminary reference on civil procedure under Art. 521(3) CPC: The dispute involved a civil matter from a case initiated in 2013, where the lower court sought the Supreme Court's ruling on a question of law to resolve a legal uncertainty or inconsistency, but the petition failed to satisfy the admissibility criteria for preliminary references. The decisive legal basis was the application of Article 521(3) of the Romanian Civil Procedure Code, which governs the mandatory nature of the High Court's decisions on preliminary references and the strict procedural requirements for their admissibility.

Keywords

AI generated
reference for a preliminary ruling Civil Procedure Code procedural requirement statutory basis matter in dispute preliminary question

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă
Cited to establish the mandatory nature of the court's decision regarding the inadmissibility of the preliminary reference.
AI generated

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă

Cited to establish the mandatory nature of the court's decision regarding the inadmissibility of the preliminary reference.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

ROMÂNIA

ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE ŞI JUSTIŢIE

Completul pentru dezlegarea unor chestiuni de drept

Minuta deciziei nr. 67 Dosar nr. 1166/1/2017

Şedinţa din 2 octombrie 2017

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

DECIDE:

Respinge, ca inadmisibilă, sesizarea formulată de Tribunalul Covasna -Secţia civilă, în dosarul nr. 3663/305/2013*, în vederea pronunţării unei hotărâri prealabile.

Obligatorie, potrivit dispoziţiilor art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă.

Pronunţată în şedinţă publică, astăzi 2 octombrie 2017.