Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
ICCJ_135981 AI generated

Preliminary ruling on interpretation of Law No. 77/2016 Article 8(5) regarding extinction of credit obligations after mortgage adjudication dismissed as inadmissible

Case Number ICCJ_135981
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice dismissed as inadmissible the request for a preliminary ruling submitted by the Călăraşi County Court regarding the interpretation of Article 8(5) of Law No. 77/2016. The dispute concerned whether debtors who remain subject to ongoing forced execution, despite the finalization of the forced execution of the mortgaged real estate through adjudication, are entitled to invoke the specific legal provision to extinguish obligations arising from credit contracts. As the court found the referral procedurally defective, no substantive legal interpretation was established, and the prior procedural status remains in force with the lower court retaining jurisdiction over the case.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 8 alin. (5) din Legea nr. 77/2016, art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă; Preliminary ruling on interpretation of Law No. 77/2016 Article 8(5) regarding extinction of credit obligations after mortgage adjudication dismissed as inadmissible: 77/2016. The dispute concerned whether debtors who remain subject to ongoing forced execution, despite the finalization of the forced execution of the mortgaged real estate through adjudication, are entitled to invoke the specific legal provision to extinguish obligations arising from credit contracts. As the court found the referral procedurally defective, no substantive legal interpretation was established, and the prior procedural status remains in force with the lower court retaining jurisdiction over the case.

Keywords

AI generated
law of obligations extinction of obligation legal status interpretation of the law preliminary contract real estate credit

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 8 alin. (5) din Legea nr. 77/2016
2998/202/2016, pentru pronunţarea unei hotărâri prealabile privind dezlegarea următoarei chestiuni de drept: „dispoziţiile art. 8 alin.
art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă
Cited as the procedural basis establishing the obligatory nature of the court's decision in the dispositive.
AI generated
ICCJ_147222
Eligibility to extinguish credit debts after adjudication of mortgaged property under Law No. 77/2016
ICCJ_139306
Interpretation of "credit contracts in progress" for real property surrender under Law No. 77/2016 and admissibility of preliminary ruling request
ICCJ_149457
Admissibility of reference to clarify scope of residential mortgage extinguishment via single property surrender under Law 77/2016
Decizia nr. 13/2019
Admissibility of cassation in mortgage debt extinguishment actions: irrelevance of monetary value threshold
Decizia nr. 61/2017
Scope of Law 77/2016 mortgage settlement rights after forced auction of collateral property.

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă

Cited as the procedural basis establishing the obligatory nature of the court's decision in the dispositive.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

ROMÂNIA

ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE ŞI JUSTIŢIE

Completul pentru dezlegarea unor chestiuni de drept

Minuta deciziei nr. 61 Dosar nr. 1101/1/2017

Şedinţa din 18 septembrie 2017

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

DECIDE:

Respinge, ca inadmisibilă, sesizarea formulată de Tribunalul Călăraşi - Secţia Civilă, în dosarul nr. 2998/202/2016, pentru pronunţarea unei hotărâri prealabile privind dezlegarea următoarei chestiuni de drept: „dispoziţiile art. 8 alin. (5) din Legea nr. 77/2016 se interpretează în sensul că pot solicita stingerea obligaţiilor izvorâte din contractele de credit în baza textului de lege menţionat şi debitorii care sunt supuşi în continuare unei executări silite deşi executarea silită a imobilului ipotecat a fost finalizată prin adjudecare”.

Obligatorie, potrivit dispoziţiilor art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă.

Pronunţată în şedinţă publică, astăzi, 18 septembrie 2017.