Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
ICCJ_135980 AI generated

Mortgage as Independent Enforceable Title: Execution of Secured Debt Without Underlying Enforceable Instrument

Case Number ICCJ_135980
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice issued a binding preliminary ruling, mandated by the Civil Procedure Code, establishing that a monetary claim secured by a valid mortgage contract can be subject to forced execution even if the underlying debt instrument itself does not qualify as an enforceable title under the law. The dispute concerned whether the execution of a claim guaranteed by a mortgage required the underlying credit right to be documented in a separate enforceable title, with the High Court resolving this legal uncertainty initiated by the Bucharest Tribunal. The decisive legal interpretation rests on Article 2431 of the Civil Code in conjunction with Article 632 of the Civil Procedure Code, which confirms that the valid mortgage contract acts as the sufficient enforceable title for execution, irrespective of the formal nature of the underlying debt document.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 2431 din Codul civil, art. 632 din Codul de procedură civilă, art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă; Mortgage as Independent Enforceable Title: Execution of Secured Debt Without Underlying Enforceable Instrument: The dispute concerned whether the execution of a claim guaranteed by a mortgage required the underlying credit right to be documented in a separate enforceable title, with the High Court resolving this legal uncertainty initiated by the Bucharest Tribunal. The decisive legal interpretation rests on Article 2431 of the Civil Code in conjunction with Article 632 of the Civil Procedure Code, which confirms that the valid mortgage contract acts as the sufficient enforceable title for execution, irrespective of the formal nature of the underlying debt document.

Keywords

AI generated
enforceable title mortgage enforcement contract interpretation article of civil procedure enforcement of ruling monetary debt

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 2431 din Codul civil
Substantive provision forming the basis of the preliminary ruling, defining the scope of enforcement for claims secured by mortgages.
art. 632 din Codul de procedură civilă
Procedural provision cited in the dispositive to determine whether the mortgage contract constitutes an enforceable title for forced execution.
art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă
Procedural provision establishing the binding nature of the preliminary ruling on the lower court.
AI generated
Decizia nr. 60/2017
Enforceability of mortgage contracts as independent execution titles irrespective of underlying claim status
Decizia nr. 5254/2005
Enforceability of authenticated mortgage guarantee without execution formula under Romanian civil procedure
Decizia nr. 2507/2015
Loan contract validity and mortgage inopposability under Article 1781 Civil Code; violation of mandatory cassation interpretations on characterization of claims
ICCJ_86924
Transfer of enforceable title character in bank credit contracts via debt assignment under OUG 99/2006
Decizia nr. 707/2010
Undue payment claim for mortgage-secured loan after insolvency sale; failure to prove discharge of lien and non-applicability of res judicata

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
art. 2431 din Codul civil

Substantive provision forming the basis of the preliminary ruling, defining the scope of enforcement for claims secured by mortgages.

art. 632 din Codul de procedură civilă

Procedural provision cited in the dispositive to determine whether the mortgage contract constitutes an enforceable title for forced execution.

art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă

Procedural provision establishing the binding nature of the preliminary ruling on the lower court.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

ROMÂNIA

ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE ŞI JUSTIŢIE

Completul pentru dezlegarea unor chestiuni de drept

Minuta deciziei nr. 60 Dosar nr. 845/1/2017

Şedinţa din 18 septembrie 2017

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

DECIDE:

Admite sesizarea formulată de Tribunalul Bucureşti - Secţia a IV-a Civilă, în dosarul nr. 22006/303/2016, privind pronunţarea unei hotărâri prealabile şi, în consecinţă, stabileşte că:

În interpretarea dispoziţiilor art. 2431 din Codul civil raportat la art. 632 din Codul de procedură civilă, este posibilă executarea silită a unei creanţe garantate printr-un contract de ipotecă valabil încheiat, ce constituie titlu executoriu, chiar dacă dreptul de creanţă însuşi nu este constatat printr-un înscris care să constituie, potrivit dispoziţiilor legale, titlu executoriu.

Obligatorie, potrivit dispoziţiilor art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă.

Pronunţată în şedinţă publică, astăzi 18 septembrie 2017.