Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
ICCJ_135399 AI generated

Preliminary referral on bank employees' public-officer status ruled inadmissible

Case Number ICCJ_135399
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice (Înalta Curte de Casaţie şi Justiţie) dismissed as inadmissible a referral from the Brașov Court of Appeal seeking a preliminary ruling on two questions of law, and thus no substantive ruling was issued; the dismissal is mandatory from publication in the Official Gazette under art. 477 para. (3) of the Criminal Procedure Code. The referral arose in a criminal case (file no. 7778/62/2013) and asked whether employees of a private-law legal entity—a state-capital financial banking company—qualified as public officials under art. 147 para. (1) of the 1969 Criminal Code, and whether such an entity constituted a "unit" referred to in art. 145 of that Code. The Court found the referral inadmissible, without addressing the merits of the two questions, leaving the prior proceedings and any underlying rulings unaffected.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Preliminary referral on bank employees' public-officer status ruled inadmissible: „a) Dacă angajaţii unei persoane juridice de drept privat – societate cu activitate financiar bancară cu capital de stat au calitatea de funcţionari publici potrivit art. 147 alin. (1) din Codul penal de la 1969.

Keywords

AI generated
banking law legal status preliminary ruling procedure preliminary decision status of official public legal official
AI generated
ICCJ_120661
Bank officer misconduct referral for legal classification ruled inadmissible as case-specific factual determination.
ICCJ_119911
Bank credit officer's conduct in loan fraud referral inadmissible; no merits ruling issued
Decizia nr. 22/2017
Precedential criteria for qualifying state-owned banking employees as public officials under the 1969 Penal Code via implied resolution of prior precedent
ICCJ_230276
Referral for preliminary ruling on salary rights of suspended public servants inadmissible.
ICCJ_230722
Preliminary ruling referral inadmissible; salary-grade question on public servant transfer left unresolved.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

R O M Â N I A

ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE ŞI JUSTIŢIE

COMPLETUL PENTRU DEZLEGAREA UNOR CHESTIUNI DE DREPT ÎN MATERIE PENALĂ

Minuta deciziei nr. 22 Dosar nr. 1538/1/2017

Şedinţa din data de 14 septembrie 2017

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

D E C I D E:

Respinge, ca inadmisibilă, sesizarea formulată de Curtea de Apel Brașov în dosarul nr. 7778/62/2013, prin care se solicită pronunţarea unei hotărâri prealabile pentru dezlegarea chestiunilor de drept:

„a) Dacă angajaţii unei persoane juridice de drept privat – societate cu activitate financiar bancară cu capital de stat au calitatea de funcţionari publici potrivit art. 147 alin. (1) din Codul penal de la 1969.

b) Dacă persoana juridică de drept privat – societate cu activitate financiar bancară cu capital de stat este o unitate la care se referă art. 145 din Codul penal de la 1969.”

Obligatorie de la data publicării în Monitorul Oficial al României, Partea I, potrivit art. 477 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură penală.

Pronunţată în şedinţă publică, astăzi, 14 septembrie 2017.