Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
ICCJ_134810 AI generated

Admissibility of preliminary ruling on nullity of appeal lacking judicial stamp fee proof

Case Number ICCJ_134810
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice dismissed as inadmissible the request for a preliminary ruling submitted by the Court of Appeal Suceava, leaving the lower court’s procedure pending without resolving the substantive legal issue. The dispute concerned civil procedure, specifically whether the failure to attach proof of payment of judicial stamp fees to an appeal petition renders the appeal null and void or if the deficiency can be cured later pursuant to the procedure established by Emergency Government Order No. 80/2013. The decisive legal basis for the decision was the procedural admissibility requirements for referrals to the Grand Chamber, specifically Article 521 paragraph (3) of the Civil Procedure Code, which governs the conditions for the court to issue a mandatory preliminary ruling to resolve conflicts of law.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă; Admissibility of preliminary ruling on nullity of appeal lacking judicial stamp fee proof: The dispute concerned civil procedure, specifically whether the failure to attach proof of payment of judicial stamp fees to an appeal petition renders the appeal null and void or if the deficiency can be cured later pursuant to the procedure established by Emergency Government Order No. 80/2013. The decisive legal basis for the decision was the procedural admissibility requirements for referrals to the Grand Chamber, specifically Article 521 paragraph (3) of the Civil Procedure Code, which governs the conditions for the court to issue a mandatory preliminary ruling to resolve conflicts of law.

Keywords

AI generated
preliminary ruling procedure procedural nullity article of civil procedure preliminary decision judicial law legal fees

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă
Cited as the basis for the mandatory nature of the decision, establishing the binding effect of the ruling within the procedural framework.
AI generated
Decizia nr. 2490/2019
Judicial stamp deficiency rendering civil appeal inadmissible under Romanian Civil Procedure Code
Decizia nr. 2414/2023
Cassation Appeal Annulled for Failure to Prove Payment of Judicial Stamping Fee: Extrinsical Nullity of Procedural Act
Decizia nr. 1925/2022
Failure to prove payment of judicial stamp tax renders appeal inadmissible
Decizia nr. 1046/2024
Unpaid judicial stamp fee invalidates extraordinary appeal against annulled nullity challenge
Decizia nr. 2896/2011
Admissibility of appeal despite unpaid judicial fee: lack of valid postponement request

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă

Cited as the basis for the mandatory nature of the decision, establishing the binding effect of the ruling within the procedural framework.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

ROMÂNIA

ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE ŞI JUSTIŢIE

Completul pentru dezlegarea unor chestiuni de drept

Minuta deciziei nr. 46 Dosar nr. 382/1/2017

Ședința din 19 iunie 2017

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

DECIDE:

Respinge, ca inadmisibilă, sesizarea formulată de Curtea de Apel Suceava- Secţia I civilă, în dosarul nr. 4804/285/2014, privind pronunțarea unei hotărâri prealabile pentru dezlegarea chestiunii de drept referitoare la interpretarea dispozițiilor art. 486 alin. (2) și (3) din Codul de procedură civilă, în sensul de a se lămuri dacă neatașarea dovezii plății taxei judiciare de timbru la cererea de recurs atrage sancțiunea nulității recursului, sau lipsa dovezii achitării acesteia se poate complini ulterior depunerii cererii de recurs, urmând procedura prevăzută de art. 33 alin. (2) din Ordonanța de urgență a Guvernului nr. 80/2013 privind taxele judiciare de timbru, cu modificările și completările ulterioare.

Obligatorie, potrivit dispoziţiilor art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă.

Pronunţată în şedinţă publică, astăzi, 19 iunie 2017.