Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
ICCJ_133966 AI generated

Dismissal as inadmissible of preliminary referral on building-permit condition for accession ownership claim

Case Number ICCJ_133966
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice dismissed as inadmissible a referral by the Dolj Tribunal seeking a preliminary ruling on whether an action to declare ownership of a building by artificial accession (art. 492 of the 1864 Civil Code, now art. 577) is conditioned on the claimant having obtained a building permit under Law No. 50/1991. The court did not rule on the merits of that legal question, so no substantive resolution was issued; the dismissal leaves the prior proceedings in the referring case to continue without the requested interpretive guidance. The referral was brought under the preliminary-ruling procedure for questions of law (arts. 519–521 of the Civil Procedure Code), and the High Court held that the conditions for admissibility of such a referral were not met, as the question raised did not properly fall within the scope of that procedure.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă; Dismissal as inadmissible of preliminary referral on building-permit condition for accession ownership claim: 492 of the 1864 Civil Code, now art. 577) is conditioned on the claimant having obtained a building permit under Law No. 50/1991. The court did not rule on the merits of that legal question, so no substantive resolution was issued; the dismissal leaves the prior proceedings in the referring case to continue without the requested interpretive guidance. The referral was brought under the preliminary-ruling procedure for questions of law (arts. 519–521 of the Civil Procedure Code), and the High Court held that the conditions for admissibility of such a referral were not met, as the question raised did not properly fall within the scope of that procedure.

Keywords

AI generated
preliminary building permit Civil Procedure Code preliminary ruling procedure judicial law preliminary question rules of procedure

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă
Cited as the mandatory basis for the decision, providing for the binding effect of the ruling on questions of law.
AI generated
Decizia nr. 31/2017
Admissibility of preliminary ruling: whether lack of building permit precludes establishment of property rights via artificial accession
Decizia nr. 58/2018
Admissibility of preliminary ruling on whether building permit absence impedes property acquisition via accession
ICCJ_144237
Unauthorized construction ownership referral dismissed as inadmissible for want of novel legal issue.
ICCJ_134779
Admissibility of preliminary referral on conflicting interpretation of building regularization document requirements under Law 50/1991
Decizia nr. 1048/2024
Ownership by accession claim fails: no building permit bars court recognition of property right.

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
Art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă

Cited as the mandatory basis for the decision, providing for the binding effect of the ruling on questions of law.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

ROMÂNIA

ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE ŞI JUSTIŢIE

Completul pentru dezlegarea unor chestiuni de drept

Minuta deciziei nr. 31 Dosar nr. 4152/1/2016

Şedinţa din 15 mai 2017

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

DECIDE:

Respinge, ca inadmisibilă, sesizarea formulată de Tribunalul Dolj - Secţia I civilă, în dosarul nr. 7839/215/2015, privind pronunţarea unei hotărâri prealabile cu privire la următoarea chestiune de drept:

„Interpretarea şi aplicarea dispoziţiilor art. 492 din Codul civil de la 1864 (art. 577 din actualul Cod civil), în raport cu dispoziţiile art. 35 din Codul de procedură civilă, de către instanţa căreia i se cere să pronunţe o hotărâre prin care să se constate dreptul de proprietate asupra unui imobil construcţie, în temeiul accesiunii imobiliare artificiale şi dacă admisibilitatea (sau interesul în promovarea) unei astfel de acţiuni este condiţionată de parcurgerea (sau nu), de către reclamant, a procedurii prevăzute de Legea nr. 50/1991 privind autorizarea executării lucrărilor de construcţii, republicată, cu modificările şi completările ulterioare, respectiv de eliberarea autorizaţiei de construire.”

Obligatorie, potrivit dispoziţiilor art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă.

Pronunţată în şedinţă publică, astăzi 15 mai 2017.