Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
ICCJ_133360 AI generated

Scope of State-Funded Special Education Expenses and Inter-Municipal Cost Offsetting under Disability Protection Law

Case Number ICCJ_133360
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice rejected as inadmissible the preliminary reference filed by the Bucharest Court of Appeal to settle a legal question, leaving the matter unresolved by this specific high-level pronouncement. The dispute concerned the interpretation of Law No. 448/2006 regarding the protection and promotion of rights for persons with disabilities, specifically challenging the scope of financed expenses for special and special-integrated education and whether local public administration authorities could offset these costs against one another. The decisive procedural basis for the rejection was the inapplicability or failure of requirements for such references under Article 521(3) of the Civil Procedure Code, which governs the submission of questions of law for uniform case law.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 54 din Legea nr. 448/2006, art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă; Scope of State-Funded Special Education Expenses and Inter-Municipal Cost Offsetting under Disability Protection Law: The dispute concerned the interpretation of Law No. 448/2006 regarding the protection and promotion of rights for persons with disabilities, specifically challenging the scope of financed expenses for special and special-integrated education and whether local public administration authorities could offset these costs against one another. The decisive procedural basis for the rejection was the inapplicability or failure of requirements for such references under Article 521(3) of the Civil Procedure Code, which governs the submission of questions of law for uniform case law.

Keywords

AI generated
scope of protection right to education local authority finances disability-related expenses procedural costs matter in dispute

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 54 din Legea nr. 448/2006
„Cum se interpretează dispoziţiile art. 54 din Legea nr.
art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă
Cited in the dispositive to establish that the decision is mandatory and binding on the referring court.
AI generated
Decizia nr. 25/2017
Funding source for special education and care costs: jurisdiction of domicile vs. location of educational facility under Law 448/2006
Decizia nr. 4319/2008
Scope of state-subsidized housing loans under disability protection law: exclusion of professional maternal assistants from beneficiary status
ICCJ_225828
Scope of “schooling fee” under public salary framework law: inclusion of childcare costs and mandatory cost breakdown for reimbursement
Decizia nr. 2122/2024
Discrimination claim against school authorities for failure to provide special educational services and invalidity of CNCD sanction
Decizia nr. 1189/2016
Reimbursement of social care costs between local authorities: non-retroactivity of procedural admission requirements for pre-existing institutionalizations

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă

Cited in the dispositive to establish that the decision is mandatory and binding on the referring court.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

ROMÂNIA

ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE ŞI JUSTIŢIE

Completul pentru dezlegarea unor chestiuni de drept

Minuta deciziei nr. 25 Dosar nr. 3970/1/2016

Şedinţa de la 10 aprilie 2017

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

DECIDE:

Respinge, ca inadmisibilă, sesizarea formulată de Curtea de Apel Bucureşti – Secţia a VIII-a contencios administrativ şi fiscal, în dosarul nr. 38.427/3/2015, în vederea pronunţării unei hotărâri prealabile pentru dezlegarea următoarei chestiuni de drept:

„Cum se interpretează dispoziţiile art. 54 din Legea nr. 448/2006 privind protecţia şi promovarea drepturilor persoanelor cu handicap, republicată, cu modificările şi completările ulterioare, în ceea ce priveşte sfera cheltuielilor finanţate pentru învăţământul special şi special integrat, respectiv posibilitatea de decontare a acestora între autorităţile administraţiei publice locale ?”

Obligatorie, potrivit dispoziţiilor art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă.

Pronunţată în şedinţa publică din data de 10 aprilie 2017.