Legislator Case Law & Legislation
ICCJ_133323 AI generated

Referral on homeowners' association quorum under Article 24(1) Law 230/2007 declared inadmissible.

Case Number ICCJ_133323
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice dismissed as inadmissible the referral from the Bucharest Tribunal (Fifth Civil Section) seeking a preliminary ruling on the interpretation of Article 24(1) of Law No. 230/2007—specifically, whether the quorum for adopting a homeowners' association decision should be calculated based on the number of properties or the number of condominium members. The dispute arose in a civil case involving the validity of an association decision, and the court found the procedural conditions for the referral were not met, leaving the lower court's decision undisturbed. The ruling is binding pursuant to Article 521(3) of the Civil Procedure Code.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 24 alin. (1) din Legea nr. 230/2007, art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă; Referral on homeowners' association quorum under Article 24(1) Law 230/2007 declared inadmissible: 230/2007—specifically, whether the quorum for adopting a homeowners' association decision should be calculated based on the number of properties or the number of condominium members. The dispute arose in a civil case involving the validity of an association decision, and the court found the procedural conditions for the referral were not met, leaving the lower court's decision undisturbed. The ruling is binding pursuant to Article 521(3) of the Civil Procedure Code.

Keywords

AI generated
preliminary ruling procedure article of civil procedure association preliminary decision interpretation of the law right of membership

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 24 alin. (1) din Legea nr. 230/2007
37978/299/2014, în vederea pronunţării unei hotărâri prealabile cu privire la dezlegarea chestiunii de drept ce vizează interpretarea dispoziţiilor art. 24 alin.
art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă
Used to declare the ruling binding on all courts, as required by the procedure for preliminary rulings.
AI generated

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă

Used to declare the ruling binding on all courts, as required by the procedure for preliminary rulings.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

ROMÂNIA

ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE ŞI JUSTIŢIE

Completul pentru dezlegarea unor chestiuni de drept

Minuta deciziei nr. 18 Dosar nr. 3946/1/2016

Şedinţa din 20 martie 2017

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

DECIDE:

Respinge, ca inadmisibilă, sesizarea formulată de Tribunalul Bucureşti - Secţia a V-a civilă, în dosarul nr. 37978/299/2014, în vederea pronunţării unei hotărâri prealabile cu privire la dezlegarea chestiunii de drept ce vizează interpretarea dispoziţiilor art. 24 alin. (1) din Legea nr. 230/2007, respectiv dacă, pentru întrunirea cvorumului necesar adoptării unei hotărâri a asociaţiei de proprietari, raportarea trebuie făcută la numărul de proprietăţi sau la numărul de membri ai condominiului.

Obligatorie, potrivit dispoziţiilor art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă.

Pronunţată în şedinţă publică astăzi, 20 martie 2017.