Inadmissibility of multiple requests to fix definitive penalty sums in civil enforcement
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe High Court of Cassation and Justice admitted a referral from the Cluj Tribunal and established that, under Article 906(4) of the Civil Procedure Code, it is inadmissible to file multiple requests to fix the definitive sum owed by a debtor for penalties. This decision resolved a legal dispute arising from a civil case (No. 16573/211/2015) concerning the procedural limits on executing monetary judgments for late payment penalties, specifically whether a creditor could initiate separate proceedings to determine the final amount of such penalties. The court’s ruling, based on the interpretation of Article 906(4) of the Civil Procedure Code, set a mandatory precedent requiring that the determination of the definitive sum of penalties be addressed within a single proceeding, thereby preventing the duplication of requests for the same subject matter.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedart. 906 alin. (4) Cod de procedură civilă, art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă; Inadmissibility of multiple requests to fix definitive penalty sums in civil enforcement: This decision resolved a legal dispute arising from a civil case (No. 16573/211/2015) concerning the procedural limits on executing monetary judgments for late payment penalties, specifically whether a creditor could initiate separate proceedings to determine the final amount of such penalties. The court’s ruling, based on the interpretation of Article 906(4) of the Civil Procedure Code, set a mandatory precedent requiring that the determination of the definitive sum of penalties be addressed within a single proceeding, thereby preventing the duplication of requests for the same subject matter.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedRelated Decisions
AI generatedKey legal questions extracted by Legislator
AI generatedThe main substantive provision interpreted to establish that multiple requests to fix the definitive sum of penalties are inadmissible.
Procedural provision cited to establish the binding nature of the decision for all courts.
Full text
ROMÂNIA
ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE ŞI JUSTIŢIE
Completul pentru dezlegarea unor chestiuni de drept
Minuta deciziei nr. 16 Dosar nr. 3778/1/2016
Şedinţa din 6 martie 2017
ÎN NUMELE LEGII
DECIDE:
Admite sesizarea formulată de Tribunalul Cluj - Secţia civilă în dosarul nr. 16573/211/2015 privind pronunţarea unei hotărâri prealabile şi, în consecinţă, stabileşte că:
În interpretarea şi aplicarea dispoziţiilor art. 906 alin. (4) Cod de procedură civilă, nu este admisibilă formularea mai multor cereri de fixare a sumei definitive datorate de debitor cu titlu de penalităţi.
Obligatorie, potrivit dispoziţiilor art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă.
Pronunţată în şedinţă publică astăzi, 6 martie 2017.