Court of Auditors recovery order for illegal local allocation of public funds: civil recourse against third-party beneficiaries under Art. 5, 33, 64 Law 94/1992 and Art. 1635 Civil Code
Romania (RO)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe High Court of Cassation and Justice dismissed as inadmissible a request for a preliminary ruling to resolve a legal question, thereby leaving the procedural status quo of the pending civil case undisturbed. The dispute involved a civil recovery claim against third-party beneficiaries for funds allegedly misallocated through an individual administrative act of a local public administration entity, which had been deemed illegal under administrative litigation law, with the central issue being whether the recovery measure imposed by the Court of Auditors permits such claims. The court analyzed the interplay between Articles 5(5), 33(3), and 64 of Law No. 94/1992 concerning the organization and functioning of the Court of Auditors and Articles 1635 et seq. of the Civil Code regarding recourse against third parties.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedart. 64 din Legea nr. 94/1992, art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă; Court of Auditors recovery order for illegal local allocation of public funds: civil recourse against third-party beneficiaries under Art. 5, 33, 64 Law 94/1992 and Art. 1635 Civil Code: The dispute involved a civil recovery claim against third-party beneficiaries for funds allegedly misallocated through an individual administrative act of a local public administration entity, which had been deemed illegal under administrative litigation law, with the central issue being whether the recovery measure imposed by the Court of Auditors permits such claims. The court analyzed the interplay between Articles 5(5), 33(3), and 64 of Law No. 94/1992 concerning the organization and functioning of the Court of Auditors and Articles 1635 et seq. of the Civil Code regarding recourse against third parties.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedRelated Decisions
AI generatedKey legal questions extracted by Legislator
AI generatedCited to establish that the decision rendered by the High Court is mandatory for all courts.
Full text
ROMÂNIA
ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE ŞI JUSTIŢIE
Completul pentru dezlegarea unor chestiuni de drept
Minuta deciziei nr. 13 Dosar nr. 3554/1/2016
Şedinţa din 6 martie 2017
ÎN NUMELE LEGII
DECIDE:
Respinge, ca inadmisibilă, sesizarea formulată de Curtea de Apel Constanţa – Secţia I civilă, în dosarul nr. 7430/118/2015, în vederea pronunţării unei hotărâri prealabile pentru dezlegarea următoarei chestiuni de drept:
„În interpretarea şi aplicarea dispoziţiilor art. 5 alin. (5), art. 33 alin. (3) teza ultimă şi art. 64 din Legea nr. 94/1992 privind organizarea şi funcţionarea Curţii de Conturi, republicată, cu modificările şi completările ulterioare, măsura impusă prin decizia Curţii de Conturi privind recuperarea prejudiciului produs prin alocarea nelegală de fonduri publice, printr-un act al administraţiei publice locale cu caracter individual, constatat nelegal în temeiul dispoziţiilor art. 4 din Legea contenciosului administrativ nr. 554/2004, cu modificările şi completările ulterioare, deschide calea recuperării sumelor de la terţii beneficiari, conform dispoziţiilor art. 1635 şi următoarele din Codul civil ?”.
Obligatorie, potrivit dispoziţiilor art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă.
Pronunţată în şedinţă publică, astăzi 6 martie 2017.