Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
ICCJ_132489 AI generated

Timing and procedural nature of the enforcement clause issuance for promissory notes under the Civil Procedure Code

Case Number ICCJ_132489
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Romania (Inalta Curte de Casatie si Justitie) issued a binding legal interpretation in response to a submission from the Constana Tribunal, establishing that the issuance of an enforcement clause for a promissory note occurs within the approval procedure for forced execution rather than as a separate prior step. This decision resolved a procedural dispute concerning the specific mechanics of enforcing promissory notes under the new Civil Procedure Code, determining that the act of *invescirea cu formula executorie* is integrated into the judicial approval process. The ruling is based on a unified interpretation of Article VII of Emergency Government Ordinance No. 1/2016, read in conjunction with Articles 640 and 666 of the Civil Procedure Code, which govern the initiation and approval of execution measures.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă; Timing and procedural nature of the enforcement clause issuance for promissory notes under the Civil Procedure Code: This decision resolved a procedural dispute concerning the specific mechanics of enforcing promissory notes under the new Civil Procedure Code, determining that the act of *invescirea cu formula executorie* is integrated into the judicial approval process. The ruling is based on a unified interpretation of Article VII of Emergency Government Ordinance No. 1/2016, read in conjunction with Articles 640 and 666 of the Civil Procedure Code, which govern the initiation and approval of execution measures.

Keywords

AI generated
Civil Procedure Code promissory note enforcement of ruling approval procedure negotiable instrument procedural issues

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă
Cited in the dispositive to establish that the legal interpretation adopted by the court is obligatory.
AI generated
Decizia nr. 968/2004
Provisional suspension of enforcement against promissory notes: priority of Civil Procedure Code urgent injury provisions over execution law restrictions
Decizia nr. 3577/2004
Enforcement of unsigned promissory note: timeliness of opposition and reinstatement in term after service by public notice
Decizia nr. 3113/2011
Competence for enforcement authorization of promissory notes: place of asset execution versus debtor domicile
Decizia nr. 261/2008
Validity of assignment and endorsement as prerequisites for forced execution of promissory notes in attachment against a third party
Decizia nr. 7095/2012
Exclusive territorial jurisdiction for enforcement formula on promissory notes lies with the court of the place of payment

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă

Cited in the dispositive to establish that the legal interpretation adopted by the court is obligatory.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

ROMÂNIA

ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE ŞI JUSTIŢIE

Completul pentru dezlegarea unor chestiuni de drept

Minuta deciziei nr. 7 Dosar nr. 2769/1/2016

Şedinţa din 30 ianuarie 2017

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

DECIDE:

Admite sesizarea formulată de Tribunalul Constanţa - Secţia a II-a civilă în dosarul nr.4403/212/2016 şi, în consecinţă, stabileşte că:

În interpretarea şi aplicarea unitară a dispoziţiilor art. VII din Ordonanţa de urgenţă a Guvernului nr. 1/2016 pentru modificarea Legii nr. 134/2010 privind Codul de procedură civilă şi a unor acte normative conexe, raportat la art. 640 şi art. 666 din Codul de procedură civilă, învestirea cu formulă executorie a biletului la ordin se face în cadrul procedurii de încuviinţare a executării silite, iar nu ca o etapă prealabilă distinctă.

Obligatorie, potrivit art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă.

Pronunţată în şedinţă publică, astăzi, 30 ianuarie 2017.