Legislator Case Law & Legislation
ICCJ_132488 AI generated

Referral on judicial executor fees for intuitu personae obligations declared inadmissible

Case Number ICCJ_132488
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice rejected the referral from Bucharest Court of Appeal as inadmissible, thereby upholding the lower court's procedural position in a civil dispute concerning the calculation of judicial executor fees. The case involved a challenge to the applicable fee schedule for enforcement proceedings where the subject matter was an obligation to perform a specific act *intuitu personae*. The Supreme Court determined that the question of law regarding the quantum of such fees did not meet the admissibility requirements for a preliminary ruling under Article 521(3) of the Code of Civil Procedure, resulting in no binding legal interpretation being issued on the substantive fee issue.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă; Referral on judicial executor fees for intuitu personae obligations declared inadmissible: The case involved a challenge to the applicable fee schedule for enforcement proceedings where the subject matter was an obligation to perform a specific act *intuitu personae*. The Supreme Court determined that the question of law regarding the quantum of such fees did not meet the admissibility requirements for a preliminary ruling under Article 521(3) of the Code of Civil Procedure, resulting in no binding legal interpretation being issued on the substantive fee issue.

Keywords

AI generated
legal fees judicial law preliminary ruling procedure Civil Procedure Code procedural issues enforcement proceedings

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă
Cited as the procedural basis establishing that the decision is obligatory.
AI generated

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă

Cited as the procedural basis establishing that the decision is obligatory.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

ROMÂNIA

ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE ŞI JUSTIŢIE

Completul pentru dezlegarea unor chestiuni de drept

Minuta deciziei nr. 6 Dosar nr. 2793/1/2016

Şedinţa din 30 ianuarie 2017

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

DECIDE:

Respinge, ca inadmisibilă, sesizarea formulată de Tribunalul Bucureşti - Secţia a IV-a civilă, în dosarul nr. 38424/4/2014, în vederea pronunţării unei hotărâri prealabile cu privire la dezlegarea chestiunii de drept ce vizează cuantumul onorariului executorului judecătoresc în cazul în care obiectul executării silite este o obligaţie de a face intuitu personae.

Obligatorie, potrivit dispoziţiilor art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă.

Pronunţată în şedinţă publică, astăzi 30 ianuarie 2017.