Legislator Case Law & Legislation
ICCJ_132487 AI generated

Reference on continued validity of regional facility allowances under uniform public salary framework

Case Number ICCJ_132487
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice rejected as inadmissible the reference question submitted by the Court of Appeal of Constanța regarding the uniform interpretation and application of legal provisions, thereby leaving the lower court to resolve the matter without binding guidance from the supreme instance. The dispute involved a civil case concerning the compatibility of facility allowances for personnel residing or working in designated regions of the Apuseni Mountains and the Danube Delta Biosphere Reserve with the framework of the uniform salary law for public sector employees. The specific legal issue centered on the continued applicability of Article 5(1) of Government Emergency Ordinance No. 27/1996, as republished and amended, in relation to Law No. 284/2010 on the uniform salary system for public-funded personnel, and whether the two regimes could coexist post-enactment of the latter law.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă; Reference on continued validity of regional facility allowances under uniform public salary framework: The dispute involved a civil case concerning the compatibility of facility allowances for personnel residing or working in designated regions of the Apuseni Mountains and the Danube Delta Biosphere Reserve with the framework of the uniform salary law for public sector employees. The specific legal issue centered on the continued applicability of Article 5(1) of Government Emergency Ordinance No. 27/1996, as republished and amended, in relation to Law No. 284/2010 on the uniform salary system for public-funded personnel, and whether the two regimes could coexist post-enactment of the latter law.

Keywords

AI generated
regional law uniform interpretation regional government matter in dispute reserve fund legal systems

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă
Cited in the dispositive to establish the binding nature of the court's decision regarding the reference question.
AI generated

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă

Cited in the dispositive to establish the binding nature of the court's decision regarding the reference question.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

ROMÂNIA

ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE ŞI JUSTIŢIE

Completul pentru dezlegarea unor chestiuni de drept

Minuta deciziei nr. 5 Dosar nr. 3207/1/2016

Şedinţa din 30 ianuarie 2017

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

DECIDE:

Respinge, ca inadmisibilă, sesizarea formulată de Curtea de Apel Constanţa - Secţia a II-a civilă, de contencios administrativ şi fiscal, în dosarul nr. 564/88/2015, cu privire la modul de aplicare şi interpretare unitară a prevederilor art. 5 alin. (1) din Ordonanţa Guvernului nr. 27/1996 privind acordarea de facilităţi persoanelor care domiciliază sau lucrează în unele localităţi din Munţii Apuseni şi în Rezervaţia Biosferei Delta Dunării, republicată, cu modificările ulterioare, după data intrării în vigoare a Legii-cadru nr. 284/2010 privind salarizarea unitară a personalului plătit din fonduri publice, cu modificările şi completările ulterioare.

Obligatorie, potrivit dispoziţiilor art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă.

Pronunţată în şedinţă publică astăzi, 30 ianuarie 2017.