Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
ICCJ_132485 AI generated

Building owner entitled to adjacent land and may sue to compel sale contract

Case Number ICCJ_132485
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice admitted the referral from the Dolj Tribunal and issued a preliminary ruling (mandatory under Art. 521(3) Civil Procedure Code) that the owner of a building acquired under Law No. 112/1995 has the right to also acquire ownership of the adjacent land and, if refused, may sue to compel the conclusion of the sale-purchase contract. The dispute concerned the interpretation of Articles 3, 9, and 26(3) of Law No. 112/1995, read with Art. 37 of the Methodological Norms under Government Decision No. 20/1996, regarding state-owned residential buildings transferred to the state and later sold; the court resolved the legal question in favor of the building owner’s right to the land and judicial enforcement of the transfer.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 26 alin. (3) din Legea nr. 112/1995, Art. 521 alin. (3) Cod procedură civilă; Building owner entitled to adjacent land and may sue to compel sale contract: 521(3) Civil Procedure Code) that the owner of a building acquired under Law No. 112/1995 has the right to also acquire ownership of the adjacent land and, if refused, may sue to compel the conclusion of the sale-purchase contract. The dispute concerned the interpretation of Articles 3, 9, and 26(3) of Law No. 112/1995, read with Art. 37 of the Methodological Norms under Government Decision No. 20/1996, regarding state-owned residential buildings transferred to the state and later sold; the court resolved the legal question in favor of the building owner’s right to the land and judicial enforcement of the transfer.

Keywords

AI generated
land and buildings contract of sale co-ownership civil dispute judicial law right of repossession

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 26 alin. (3) din Legea nr. 112/1995
9, art. 26 alin. (3) din Legea nr. 112/1995 pentru reglementarea situaţiei juridice a unor imobile cu destinaţia de locuinţe, trecute în proprietatea statului, cu modificările şi completările ulterioare, coroborate cu art.
Art. 521 alin. (3) Cod procedură civilă
Declares the decision binding according to this provision in the dispositive.
AI generated
Decizia nr. 2032/2016
Ownership of commercial space on state-owned land: conflict between statutory transfer to municipality and construction by third party under civil code accession rules
Decizia nr. 1525/2008
Enforcement of sale of land accessory to privatized building by subsequent purchaser absent direct legal relationship with original state owner
Decizia nr. 2441/2009
Property ownership confirmation over commercial spaces: Appeal allowed, State declared proper party despite claim of ex lege transfer to local authority.
Decizia nr. 859/2006
Scope of property transfer in installment sales: commercial space ownership versus land usage rights under Decree-Law No. 61/1990 and Law No. 54/1998
Decizia nr. 578/2021
Judicial recognition of property rights over unauthorized construction extensions via accession and transfer of demolition obligations to subsequent owners

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
Art. 521 alin. (3) Cod procedură civilă

Declares the decision binding according to this provision in the dispositive.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

ROMÂNIA

ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE ŞI JUSTIŢIE

Completul pentru dezlegarea unor chestiuni de drept

Minuta deciziei nr. 3 Dosar nr. 3370/1/2016

Şedinţa de la 30 ianuarie 2017

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

DECIDE:

Admite sesizarea formulată de Tribunalul Dolj - Secţia I civilă, în dosarul nr. 44791/215/2014, privind pronunţarea unei hotărâri prealabile şi, în consecinţă, stabileşte că:

În interpretarea şi aplicarea dispoziţiilor art. 3, art. 9, art. 26 alin. (3) din Legea nr. 112/1995 pentru reglementarea situaţiei juridice a unor imobile cu destinaţia de locuinţe, trecute în proprietatea statului, cu modificările şi completările ulterioare, coroborate cu art. 37 din Normele metodologice privind aplicarea Legii nr. 112/1995 pentru reglementarea situaţiei juridice a unor imobile cu destinaţia de locuinţe, trecute în proprietatea statului, stabilite prin Hotărârea Guvernului nr. 20/1996, republicate, stabileşte că proprietarul construcţiei are dreptul să dobândească proprietatea şi asupra terenului aferent acesteia şi să solicite, în caz de refuz, pe calea acţiunii în justiţie, obligarea la perfectarea contractului de vânzare-cumpărare.

Obligatorie, potrivit dispoziţiilor art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă.

Pronunţată în şedinţă publică, astăzi 30 ianuarie 2017.