Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
ICCJ_132484 AI generated

Whether in-house legal counsel holding dual qualification as industrial property consultants may represent legal persons in court proceedings under Ordonance No. 66/2000

Case Number ICCJ_132484
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

In a decision mandated by the Inter-State Court of Justice and Justice, the High Court of Cassation and Justice admitted the preliminary ruling request from the Bucharest Court of Appeal and established that the contractual representation of legal persons before courts may be ensured by an in-house legal counsel who also holds the qualification of an industrial property consultant. This ruling resolves a dispute concerning the scope of the Ordonance No. 66/2000 regarding the organization and practice of the industrial property consulting profession, specifically interpreting Article 28(2) in conjunction with Article 20(1) to determine whether such dual-qualified in-house personnel possess the standing to represent entities in judicial proceedings. The interpretation is mandatory for all lower courts pursuant to Article 521(3) of the Code of Civil Procedure.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă; Whether in-house legal counsel holding dual qualification as industrial property consultants may represent legal persons in court proceedings under Ordonance No. 66/2000: This ruling resolves a dispute concerning the scope of the Ordonance No. 66/2000 regarding the organization and practice of the industrial property consulting profession, specifically interpreting Article 28(2) in conjunction with Article 20(1) to determine whether such dual-qualified in-house personnel possess the standing to represent entities in judicial proceedings. The interpretation is mandatory for all lower courts pursuant to Article 521(3) of the Code of Civil Procedure.

Keywords

AI generated
legal representation industrial property Civil Procedure Code standing to appeal legal entity mandated counsel

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă
Cited to establish the mandatory nature of the preliminary ruling decision for all courts.
AI generated
Decizia nr. 2/2017
In-house IP adviser can represent legal persons in court, High Court rules preliminarily.
Decizia nr. 244/2023
Validity of in-house legal advisor’s representation: sufficiency of authorization for corporate appeal standing
ICCJ_128094
Prohibition of conventional representation of legal entities by other legal entities or their in-house counsel in civil proceedings
ICCJ_86186
Cassation in the interest of the law admitted; registration of commercial companies for legal consulting and representation declared inadmissible
ICCJ_141006
Prohibition of corporate representation by legal entities or their counsel in civil proceedings; referral admitted and interpretation established

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă

Cited to establish the mandatory nature of the preliminary ruling decision for all courts.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

ROMÂNIA

ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE ŞI JUSTIŢIE

Completul pentru dezlegarea unor chestiuni de drept

Minuta deciziei nr. 2 Dosar nr. 3358/1/2016

Şedinţa de la 30 ianuarie 2017

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

DECIDE:

Admite sesizarea formulată de Curtea de Apel Bucureşti – Secţia a IV-a civilă, în dosarul nr. 25502/3/2014, privind pronunţarea unei hotărâri prealabile şi, în consecinţă, stabileşte că:

În interpretarea şi aplicarea dispoziţiilor art. 28 alin. (2) coroborate cu cele ale art. 20 alin. (1) din Ordonanţa Guvernului nr. 66/2000 privind organizarea şi exercitarea profesiei de consilier în proprietate industrială, republicată, reprezentarea convenţională a persoanelor juridice în faţa instanţelor de judecată poate fi asigurată şi prin consilierul juridic angajat al uneia dintre formele de exercitare a profesiei de consilier în proprietate industrială, în măsura în care consilierul juridic are şi calitatea de consilier în proprietate industrială.

Obligatorie, potrivit dispoziţiilor art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă.

Pronunţată în şedinţă publică, astăzi 30 ianuarie 2017.