Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
ICCJ_131539 AI generated

Timing of domicile fulfillment for land allocation and applicable sanction for non-compliance

Case Number ICCJ_131539
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice, acting as a body for resolving legal questions, admitted connected references from the Court of Appeal and issued a binding interpretation stating that the condition of having a registered domicile in the locality where land is allocated can be fulfilled after the issuance of the title deed; consequently, failure to meet this requirement does not invalidate the allocation but triggers the specific sanction provided by law. The case involved a legal question regarding the application of the Land Fund Law to determine the consequences of non-compliance with domicile requirements in land allocation proceedings. The decisive legal basis comprises Article 21(2) and Article 49 of Land Fund Law No. 18/1991 (as republished and amended), which together establish that post-issuance domicile fulfillment is permissible and that only the specific sanction in Article 49 applies for non-compliance.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 21 alin. (2) din Legea fondului funciar nr. 18/1991, art. 49 din aceeaşi lege, art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă; Timing of domicile fulfillment for land allocation and applicable sanction for non-compliance: The case involved a legal question regarding the application of the Land Fund Law to determine the consequences of non-compliance with domicile requirements in land allocation proceedings. The decisive legal basis comprises Article 21(2) and Article 49 of Land Fund Law No. 18/1991 (as republished and amended), which together establish that post-issuance domicile fulfillment is permissible and that only the specific sanction in Article 49 applies for non-compliance.

Keywords

AI generated
land law domicile rulings providing an interpretation grounds for cassation expulsion from housing allocation of family home

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 21 alin. (2) din Legea fondului funciar nr. 18/1991
Main ground for the uniform interpretation of the domicile condition in land allocation proceedings.
art. 49 din aceeaşi lege
Basis for the specific sanction applicable when the domicile condition is not met.
art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă
Procedural basis establishing the binding nature of the decision for the referring courts.
AI generated
Decizia nr. 39/2016
Land Fund Law domicile requirement: resolutory condition permitting post-issuance compliance vs. title nullity
Decizia nr. 2606/2016
Non-compliance with enforcement of land allocation obligation; nullity of appeal for lack of structured legal arguments on cassation grounds
ICCJ_205370
Eligibility of corporate entities for land ownership under Law No. 18/1991 Art. 27(23) and retention of residential status after transfer to a legal person
Decizia nr. 1723/2015
Land title conflict and wrongful possession: quashed and remanded for failure to apply land fund law and insufficient reasoning on eviction.
Decizia nr. 5103/2013
Challenge to land compensation order: non-compliance with restitution procedure and appellate court’s failure to analyze action clarification

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
art. 21 alin. (2) din Legea fondului funciar nr. 18/1991

Main ground for the uniform interpretation of the domicile condition in land allocation proceedings.

art. 49 din aceeaşi lege

Basis for the specific sanction applicable when the domicile condition is not met.

art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă

Procedural basis establishing the binding nature of the decision for the referring courts.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

ROMÂNIA

ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE ŞI JUSTIŢIE

Completul pentru dezlegarea unor chestiuni de drept

Minuta deciziei nr. 39 Dosar nr. 2598/1/2016

Şedinţa din 7 noiembrie 2016

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

DECIDE:

Admite sesizările conexate formulate de Tribunalul Constanţa - Secţia I civilă în dosarele nr. 14150/212/2015 şi nr. 11092/212/2015, privind pronunţarea unei hotărâri prealabile şi, în consecinţă, stabileşte că:

În interpretarea şi aplicarea dispoziţiilor art. 21 alin. (2) din Legea fondului funciar nr. 18/1991, republicată, cu modificările şi completările ulterioare, condiţia de stabilire a domiciliului în localitatea în care se atribuie terenul poate fi îndeplinită ulterior emiterii titlului de proprietate, neîndeplinirea acesteia atrăgând sancţiunea specifică prevăzută de dispoziţiile art. 49 din aceeaşi lege.

Obligatorie, potrivit dispoziţiilor art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă.

Pronunţată în şedinţă publică, astăzi 7 noiembrie 2016.