Inadmissibility of preliminary reference on interpretation of Romanian labor law provisions regarding dismissal and severance
Romania (RO)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe High Court of Cassation and Justice, in its Complete Formation for Resolving Issues of Law, dismissed as inadmissible the connected preliminary reference questions submitted by the Court of Appeal regarding the interpretation and application of specific labor law provisions. The dispute involved a request to clarify the interplay between Government Decision No. 679/2003, Article 10(1)(f), and Labor Code Law No. 272/2004, Article 122(3)(d), in relation to Articles 1(2), 144, 149, and 253 of the Labor Code. The decisive legal basis was the procedural inadmissibility of the appeals under Article 521(3) of the Civil Procedure Code, resulting in no resolution of the underlying legal interpretation and leaving the reference questions unanswered by the supreme court.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedart. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă; Inadmissibility of preliminary reference on interpretation of Romanian labor law provisions regarding dismissal and severance: The dispute involved a request to clarify the interplay between Government Decision No. 679/2003, Article 10(1)(f), and Labor Code Law No. 272/2004, Article 122(3)(d), in relation to Articles 1(2), 144, 149, and 253 of the Labor Code. The decisive legal basis was the procedural inadmissibility of the appeals under Article 521(3) of the Civil Procedure Code, resulting in no resolution of the underlying legal interpretation and leaving the reference questions unanswered by the supreme court.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedRelated Decisions
AI generatedKey legal questions extracted by Legislator
AI generatedCited to establish the obligatory effect of the decision in the dispositive.
Full text
ROMÂNIA
ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE ŞI JUSTIŢIE
Completul pentru dezlegarea unor chestiuni de drept
Minuta deciziei nr. 29 Dosar nr. 1991/1/2016
Şedinţa din 17 octombrie 2016
ÎN NUMELE LEGII
DECIDE:
Respinge, ca inadmisibile, sesizările conexate formulate de Curtea de Apel Iaşi - Secţia Litigii de Muncă şi Asigurări Sociale în dosarele nr. 3918/99/2015 şi nr. 3919/99/2015 privind pronunţarea unei hotărâri prealabile pentru dezlegarea modului de interpretare şi aplicare a dispoziţiilor art. 10 alin. (1) lit. f) din Hotărârea Guvernului nr. 679/2003, precum şi a dispoziţiilor art. 122 alin. (3) lit. d) teza I din Legea nr. 272/2004 prin raportare la art. 1 alin. (2), art. 144, art. 149 şi art. 253 din Codul muncii.
Obligatorie, potrivit dispoziţiilor art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă.
Pronunţată în şedinţă publică astăzi, 17 octombrie 2016.