Inadmissible referral on judicial-status pay provision leaves prior ruling intact
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe High Court of Cassation and Justice (Înalta Curte de Casaţie şi Justiţie), sitting as a panel for the resolution of questions of law, dismissed as inadmissible the referral from the Oradea Court of Appeal (Section I civil) concerning a preliminary ruling on the interpretation of art. 832(1) of Law No. 303/2004 on the status of judges and prosecutors. The prior ruling remains in force. The dispute arose in a civil case (No. 936/108/2015) where the appellate court sought clarification on the application of this statutory provision, likely involving judicial or prosecutorial status matters. The decisive basis was the inadmissibility of the referral, meaning the procedural conditions for a preliminary ruling under the relevant provisions (art. 521(3) of the Civil Procedure Code) were not met. The decision is binding, and no substantive interpretation of the statute was provided.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedart. 832 alin. (1) din Legea nr. 303/2004, Art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă; Inadmissible referral on judicial-status pay provision leaves prior ruling intact: 832(1) of Law No. 303/2004 on the status of judges and prosecutors. The prior ruling remains in force. The dispute arose in a civil case (No. 936/108/2015) where the appellate court sought clarification on the application of this statutory provision, likely involving judicial or prosecutorial status matters. The decisive basis was the inadmissibility of the referral, meaning the procedural conditions for a preliminary ruling under the relevant provisions (art. 521(3) of the Civil Procedure Code) were not met. The decision is binding, and no substantive interpretation of the statute was provided.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedRelated Decisions
AI generatedKey legal questions extracted by Legislator
AI generatedDeclares that the decision is binding, according to the procedural rule on preliminary rulings.
Full text
ROMÂNIA
ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE ŞI JUSTIŢIE
Completul pentru dezlegarea unor chestiuni de drept
Minuta deciziei nr. 28 Dosar nr. 1812/1/2016
Şedinţa de la 17 octombrie 2016
ÎN NUMELE LEGII
DECIDE:
Respinge, ca inadmisibilă, sesizarea formulată de Curtea de Apel Oradea - Secţia I civilă, în dosarul nr. 936/108/2015, privind pronunţarea unei hotărâri prealabile pentru dezlegarea modului de interpretare şi aplicare a dispoziţiilor art. 832 alin. (1) din Legea nr. 303/2004 privind statutul judecătorilor şi procurorilor, republicată, cu modificările şi completările ulterioare.
Obligatorie, potrivit dispoziţiilor art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă.
Pronunţată în şedinţă publică, astăzi 17 octombrie 2016.