Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
ICCJ_130107 AI generated

Abrogation of Land Fund Law provisions on intra-urban land reversion confirmed under Civil Code

Case Number ICCJ_130107
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court (High Court of Cassation and Justice) admitted the request for the resolution of a legal question and established the definitive legal principle that the provisions of Article 26 of the Land Fund Law No. 18/1991 have been abrogated by the entry into force of Article 1.138 of the Civil Code regarding the legal regime of intra-urban land plots that revert to local public administration authorities upon the death or lack of heirs of the owners. This ruling arose from a dispute initiated by the Bucharest Court of Appeal regarding the applicable law for such land reversion cases, with the decisive legal basis being the supremacy of the new Civil Code provisions over the specialized land legislation.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 1.138 din Codul civil, art. 26 din Legea fondului funciar nr. 18/1991, art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă; Abrogation of Land Fund Law provisions on intra-urban land reversion confirmed under Civil Code: 18/1991 have been abrogated by the entry into force of Article 1.138 of the Civil Code regarding the legal regime of intra-urban land plots that revert to local public administration authorities upon the death or lack of heirs of the owners. This ruling arose from a dispute initiated by the Bucharest Court of Appeal regarding the applicable law for such land reversion cases, with the decisive legal basis being the supremacy of the new Civil Code provisions over the specialized land legislation.

Keywords

AI generated
land law local legislation civil dispute entry into force fund regulations revocation of settlement permit

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 1.138 din Codul civil
Cited in the operative order to establish that this provision abrogated the contested land law regulations regarding the regime of intra-urban lands reverting to local authorities.
art. 26 din Legea fondului funciar nr. 18/1991
The provision whose abrogation was determined by the court in the final ruling on the legal question.
art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă
Cited to establish the binding nature of the decision issued by the Supreme Court on the resolution of the legal question.
AI generated
Decizia nr. 22/2016
Abrogation of Land Fund Law Article 26 by Civil Code: Vacant inheritances enter local private domain, not public domain
Decizia nr. 1326/2014
Land revindication: conflict between Civil Code and Law 10/2001 requiring clarification of legal basis and assessment of administrative restitution decree’s nullity
Decizia nr. 4485/2003
Land restitution: jurisdiction of Land Fund Law vs. general revindication and failure to enforce prior possession order
Decizia nr. 6350/2006
Complementary scope of Land Law No. 10/2001 for unrestituted urban land under Land Fund Law No. 18/1991
Decizia nr. 4739/2003
Land restitution: exclusion of intravilan land covered by prior reconstitution statutes (Law 18/1991) from Law 10/2001 abrogation regime

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
art. 1.138 din Codul civil

Cited in the operative order to establish that this provision abrogated the contested land law regulations regarding the regime of intra-urban lands reverting to local authorities.

art. 26 din Legea fondului funciar nr. 18/1991

The provision whose abrogation was determined by the court in the final ruling on the legal question.

art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă

Cited to establish the binding nature of the decision issued by the Supreme Court on the resolution of the legal question.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

ROMÂNIA

ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE ŞI JUSTIŢIE

Completul pentru dezlegarea unor chestiuni de drept

Minuta deciziei nr. 22 Dosar nr. 1708/1/2016

Şedinţa din 26 septembrie 2016

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

DECIDE:

Admite sesizarea formulată de Curtea de Apel Braşov - Secţia contencios administrativ şi fiscal, în dosarul nr. 283/119/2015 şi, în consecinţă, stabileşte că:

Dispoziţiile art. 26 din Legea fondului funciar nr. 18/1991, republicată (în forma de la data intrării în vigoare a Legii nr. 158/2010 pentru modificarea art. 26 din Legea fondului funciar nr. 18/1991) au fost abrogate prin intrarea în vigoare a art. 1.138 din Codul civil, în ceea ce priveşte regimul juridic al terenurilor din intravilanul localităţilor, rămase la dispoziţia autorităţilor administraţiei publice locale, de la persoanele care au decedat şi/sau nu au moştenitori.

Obligatorie, potrivit dispoziţiilor art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă.

Pronunţată în şedinţă publică astăzi, 26 septembrie 2016.