Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Decizia nr. 1130/2004 AI generated

Appeal withdrawn; pension review superseded by revised agency decision, prior dismissal stands final

Case Number Decizia nr. 1130/2004
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome struck_off
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Romanian High Court of Cassation and Justice took formal note of the claimant's withdrawal of the appeal against the Court of Appeal Ploiești's judgment of 28 July 2003, thereby allowing the lower court's dismissal of the claim to stand as final. The underlying dispute concerned the claimant's challenge to a decision of the County Pensions Board's specialized commission refusing to count his military service as work detachments under Law No. 309/2002; the appeal became moot because the competent authority revised its decision and granted the rights by a new decision of 4 February 2004. The court based its ruling on Article 246 of the Romanian Code of Civil Procedure, which permits a party to abandon the action at any stage; no substantive legal analysis of the pension conditions was undertaken.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 1 din Legea nr. 309/2002, art. 246 C. proc. civ; Appeal withdrawn; pension review superseded by revised agency decision, prior dismissal stands final: The underlying dispute concerned the claimant's challenge to a decision of the County Pensions Board's specialized commission refusing to count his military service as work detachments under Law No. 309/2002; the appeal became moot because the competent authority revised its decision and granted the rights by a new decision of 4 February 2004. The court based its ruling on Article 246 of the Romanian Code of Civil Procedure, which permits a party to abandon the action at any stage; no substantive legal analysis of the pension conditions was undertaken.

Keywords

AI generated
pension review standing to appeal withdrawal of action cassation review civil judgment suspension of disability pension

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 1 din Legea nr. 309/2002
85/2003, emisă de Comisia de specialitate a Casei Județene de Pensii Buzău, reținând, în esență, că nu sunt îndeplinite condițiile art. 1 din Legea nr.
art. 246 C. proc. civ
Procedural rule applied in the dispositive to take note of the appellant's withdrawal of the appeal.
AI generated
Decizia nr. 1018/2003
Pension appeal withdrawn after review grants rights recognition; appellate judgment stands.
Decizia nr. 8830/2004
Pension rights fully granted; appeal over abandoned administrative action held unfounded
Decizia nr. 1033/2003
Pension appeal withdrawn after fund granted rights; withdrawal accepted, lower judgment stands.
Decizia nr. 2208/2003
Appeal for revision of pension denial judgment dismissed
Decizia nr. 3058/2018
Pension decision challenge appeal inadmissible; finality of appeals court ruling upheld

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
Art. 246 C. proc. civ.

Procedural rule applied in the dispositive to take note of the appellant's withdrawal of the appeal.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Asupra recursului de față;

Din examinarea lucrărilor din dosar, constată următoarele:

Prin sentința civilă nr. 175, pronunțată la data de 28 iulie 2003, în dosarul nr. 5875/2003, Curtea de Apel Ploiești, secția comercială și de contencios administrativ, a respins contestația formulată de reclamantul D.Ș. împotriva hotărârii nr. 85/2003, emisă de Comisia de specialitate a Casei Județene de Pensii Buzău, reținând, în esență, că nu sunt îndeplinite condițiile art. 1 din Legea nr. 309/2002, deoarece nu a rezultat că detașamentele de muncă în care acesta a efectuat stagiul militar, au făcut parte din Direcția Generală a Serviciului Muncii.

Împotriva acestei soluții a formulat recurs, reclamantul, la care, prin cererea înregistrată la data de 11 martie 2004, a renunțat, precizând că autoritatea competentă și-a revizuit hotărârea, recunoscându-i drepturile prin decizia nr. 91514 din 4 februarie 2004.

Având în vedere dispozițiile art. 246 C. proc. civ., se va lua act de renunțarea recurentului-reclamant, la judecarea cererii de recurs.

PENTRU ACESTE MOTIVE

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

DE C I D E

Ia act de renunțarea la judecata recursului declarat de D.Ș. împotriva sentinței nr. 175 din 28 iulie 2003, a Curții de Apel Ploiești, secția comercială și de contencios administrativ.

Pronunțată în ședință publică, astăzi 18 martie 2004.