Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
ICCJ_128111 AI generated

Scope of public servant dismissal provisions under Article 99 of Law No. 188/1999

Case Number ICCJ_128111
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice, sitting as the General Division for resolving legal issues, admitted the preliminary reference filed by the Oradea Court of Appeal and issued a binding interpretation, establishing that Article 99(6) of Law No. 188/1999 applies to both situations regulated by Article 99(1)(a) of the same statute. The dispute involved a question of public service status and civil procedure, specifically concerning the applicability of dismissal-related provisions to different scenarios of termination or change in status within the public sector. The decisive legal basis was the interpretation of Article 99 of Law No. 188/1999 (Public Service Statute), with the ruling issued as obligatory under Article 521(3) of the Code of Civil Procedure, thereby clarifying the scope of dismissal protections for public officials.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 99 alin. (6) din Legea nr. 188/1999, art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă; Scope of public servant dismissal provisions under Article 99 of Law No. 188/1999: 188/1999 applies to both situations regulated by Article 99(1)(a) of the same statute. The dispute involved a question of public service status and civil procedure, specifically concerning the applicability of dismissal-related provisions to different scenarios of termination or change in status within the public sector. The decisive legal basis was the interpretation of Article 99 of Law No. 188/1999 (Public Service Statute), with the ruling issued as obligatory under Article 521(3) of the Code of Civil Procedure, thereby clarifying the scope of dismissal protections for public officials.

Keywords

AI generated
dismissal of civil servant public service scope of protection public legal official termination of service interpretation of the law

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 99 alin. (6) din Legea nr. 188/1999
Dispoziţiile art. 99 alin. (6) din Legea nr. 188/1999 privind Statutul funcţionarilor publici, republicată, cu modificările şi completările ulterioare, se aplică în ambele situaţii reglementate de art.
art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă
Cited in the dispositive to establish that the binding interpretation issued by the High Court of Cassation and Justice is obligatory for the courts involved.
AI generated
Decizia nr. 2986/2018
Conflict of jurisdiction over public servant dismissal: application of Law no. 188/1999 for service relationship disputes
Decizia nr. 6108/2019
Dismissal of public official upheld: sick-leave notice missed and reorganization valid under Law 188/1999
Decizia nr. 3934/2012
Lawfulness of public servant dismissal following statutory staff reduction and competitive reassignment procedure under Law No. 188/1999
Decizia nr. 4139/2014
Public servant dismissal: Competence of administrative court for accessory wage claims under Law No. 188/1999
Decizia nr. 5617/2005
Illegality of public servant dismissal under Law No. 188/1999 and application of functional status to reappointment

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă

Cited in the dispositive to establish that the binding interpretation issued by the High Court of Cassation and Justice is obligatory for the courts involved.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

ROMÂNIA

ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE ŞI JUSTIŢIE

Completul pentru dezlegarea unor chestiuni de drept

Minuta deciziei nr. 12 Dosar nr. 603/1/2016

Şedinţa de la 18 aprilie 2016

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

DECIDE:

Admite sesizarea privind pronunţarea unei hotărâri prealabile, formulată de Curtea de Apel Oradea – Secţia a II-a civilă, de contencios administrativ şi fiscal, în dosarul nr. 5644/83/CA/2013-R, la care s-a conexat dosarul nr. 5645/83/CA/2013-R, şi în consecinţă stabileşte că:

Dispoziţiile art. 99 alin. (6) din Legea nr. 188/1999 privind Statutul funcţionarilor publici, republicată, cu modificările şi completările ulterioare, se aplică în ambele situaţii reglementate de art. 99 alin. (1) lit. a) din aceeaşi lege.

Obligatorie, potrivit dispoziţiilor art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă.

Pronunţată în şedinţa publică din data de 18 aprilie 2016.