Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Decizia nr. 1872/2015 AI generated

Jurisdiction declined for judge removal request in civil case; matter referred to Court of Appeal

Case Number Decizia nr. 1872/2015
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice declined jurisdiction over a request to transfer a civil case, ruling that the matter must be resolved by the Court of Appeal Galați; this decision is final and without appeal. The dispute involved a procedural challenge filed by a plaintiff against a lower court (Adjud District Court) seeking the removal of a judge based on legitimate suspicion in a civil action initiated after the entry into force of the new Code of Civil Procedure. The decisive legal basis was Article 142(1) of the Code of Civil Procedure, which establishes that requests for case transfer from a district court or regional court fall within the exclusive competence of the appellate court, thereby precluding the supreme court from hearing the application.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 142 alin. (1) C. proc. Civ; Jurisdiction declined for judge removal request in civil case; matter referred to Court of Appeal: The dispute involved a procedural challenge filed by a plaintiff against a lower court (Adjud District Court) seeking the removal of a judge based on legitimate suspicion in a civil action initiated after the entry into force of the new Code of Civil Procedure. The decisive legal basis was Article 142(1) of the Code of Civil Procedure, which establishes that requests for case transfer from a district court or regional court fall within the exclusive competence of the appellate court, thereby precluding the supreme court from hearing the application.

Keywords

AI generated
declining of jurisdiction civil dispute action for removal transfer of competence judicial law preliminary ruling procedure

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 142 alin. (1) C. proc. Civ
Main ground for the decision, establishing that the Court of Appeal has jurisdiction over transfer requests from courts within its district.
AI generated
Încheierea nr. 2419/2014
Judicial transfer request rejected: failure to establish grounds for moving civil appeal from original appellate court
Decizia nr. 357/2017
Transfer of civil case: jurisdiction declined and referred to Court of Appeal
Încheierea nr. 857/2014
Civil case: Rejection of petition for transfer of jurisdiction to appeal court
Decizia nr. 2245/2021
Request for removal of cases transferred to appellate court for lack of jurisdiction
Decizia nr. 1998/2016
Request for case transfer to another court declined for lack of material jurisdiction

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
art. 142 alin. (1) C. proc. Civ

Main ground for the decision, establishing that the Court of Appeal has jurisdiction over transfer requests from courts within its district.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Constatând că se solicită strămutarea unui dosar aflat pe rolul judecătoriei Adjud, având ca obiect o acţiune formulată după data intrării în vigoare a Legii nr. 134/2010 privind noul Cod de procedură civilă, în raport de dispoziţiile art. 142 alin. (1) C. proc. Civ „potrivit cărora „cererea de strămutare întemeiată pe motiv de bănuială legitimă este de competenţa curţii de apel, dacă instanţa de la care se cere strămutarea este o judecătorie sau un tribunal din circumscripţia acesteia”.

PENTRU ACESTE MOTIVE

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

D E C I D E

Declină competenţa de soluţionare a cererii de strămutare a Dosarului nr. 3781/173/2014 al Judecătoriei Adjud, formulată de petentul C.V., în favoarea Curţii de Apel Galaţi.

Fără cale de atac.

Pronunţată în şedinţă publică, astăzi 24 septembrie 2015.