Procuring typicity requirement for repeated sexual acts with the same person for profit

The Supreme Court (High Court of Cassation and Justice) dismissed as inadmissible the request for a preliminary ruling submitted by the Court of Appeal of Craiova, meaning no definitive judicial interpretation was issued on the specific legal issue, leaving the lower court to resolve the matter based on existing law. The dispute centered on whether the crime of procuring lacks the element of specificity in cases where sexual acts were performed repeatedly for profit but involved the same person, a question raised during the criminal trial of an individual charged with procuring. The decisive legal basis for the dismissal was the procedural rule governing the admissibility of requests for the resolution of legal questions in criminal matters, which the Court found not to meet the statutory requirements for intervention by the Complete Bench for Resolving Legal Questions.