Legislator Case Law & Legislation
ICCJ_123191 AI generated

Curator’s standing to file appeal for defendant cited by publication: admissibility of preliminary referral on civil procedure

Case Number ICCJ_123191
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice dismissed as inadmissible the referral regarding the interpretation of Article 167(3) of the Code of Civil Procedure, thereby preventing a preliminary ruling on the standing of a curator appointed for a defendant cited by publication to declare the right of appeal on behalf of said defendant. The dispute concerned procedural standing, specifically whether the curator possessed the legal capacity to file an appeal against a first-instance judgment when the original defendant was summoned via public notice. The Court relied on the inadmissibility of the referral under Article 521(3) of the Code of Civil Procedure, resulting in no new substantive interpretation or override of the lower tribunal's procedural framework.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă; Curator’s standing to file appeal for defendant cited by publication: admissibility of preliminary referral on civil procedure: The dispute concerned procedural standing, specifically whether the curator possessed the legal capacity to file an appeal against a first-instance judgment when the original defendant was summoned via public notice. The Court relied on the inadmissibility of the referral under Article 521(3) of the Code of Civil Procedure, resulting in no new substantive interpretation or override of the lower tribunal's procedural framework.

Keywords

AI generated
Civil Procedure Code standing to appeal preliminary ruling procedure procedural interpretation of judgment summons public notice

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă
Basis for the mandatory nature of the decision rendered by the Complete for resolving questions of law.
AI generated

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă

Basis for the mandatory nature of the decision rendered by the Complete for resolving questions of law.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

ROMÂNIA

ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE ŞI JUSTIŢIE

Completul pentru dezlegarea unor chestiuni de drept

Minuta deciziei nr.31 Dosar nr. 2408/1/2015

Şedinţa din 19 octombrie 2015

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

DECIDE:

Respinge, ca inadmisibilă, sesizarea formulată de Tribunalul Neamţ - Secţia I civilă, în dosarul nr. 447/188/2014, privind pronunţarea unei hotărâri prealabile pentru dezlegarea modului de interpretare şi aplicare a prevederilor art. 167 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă, în ceea ce priveşte calitatea curatorului numit pentru pârâtul citat prin publicitate de a declara calea de atac a apelului împotriva sentinţei primei instanţe, în reprezentarea intereselor acestuia.

Obligatorie, potrivit dispoziţiilor art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă.

Pronunţată în şedinţă publică, astăzi 19 octombrie 2015.