Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
ICCJ_122504 AI generated

Non-abrogation of 1993 budgetary salary norms by 2011 teaching staff classification law

Case Number ICCJ_122504
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice issued a binding interpretation, ruling that the provisions of Article 6 of Law No. 63/2011 regarding the classification and salaries of teaching and auxiliary teaching staff for 2011 did not abrogate the provisions of Article 23 of Government Decision No. 281/1993 concerning the salaries of personnel in budget-funded units. This decision resolved a reference question submitted by the Court of Appeal Iaşi in a labor dispute case, establishing that the specific 2011 salary law did not repeal the general 1993 framework, thereby leaving the 1993 regulations in force for the relevant subject matter. The operative legal basis for this conclusion is the interpretation of Article 6 of Law No. 63/2011 in conjunction with Article 23 of Government Decision No. 281/1993, applied under Article 521(3) of the Code of Civil Procedure to ensure uniformity in the interpretation of these conflicting norms.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 6 din Legea nr. 63/2011, art. 23 din Hotărârea Guvernului nr. 281/1993, art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă; Non-abrogation of 1993 budgetary salary norms by 2011 teaching staff classification law: 63/2011 regarding the classification and salaries of teaching and auxiliary teaching staff for 2011 did not abrogate the provisions of Article 23 of Government Decision No. 281/1993 concerning the salaries of personnel in budget-funded units. This decision resolved a reference question submitted by the Court of Appeal Iaşi in a labor dispute case, establishing that the specific 2011 salary law did not repeal the general 1993 framework, thereby leaving the 1993 regulations in force for the relevant subject matter. The operative legal basis for this conclusion is the interpretation of Article 6 of Law No. 63/2011 in conjunction with Article 23 of Government Decision No. 281/1993, applied under Article 521(3) of the Code of Civil Procedure to ensure uniformity in the interpretation of these conflicting norms.

Keywords

AI generated
salary classification staff regulations general budget framework decision matter in dispute interpretation of the law

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 6 din Legea nr. 63/2011
Provision at issue whose interpretation was requested and resolved in the operative order.
art. 23 din Hotărârea Guvernului nr. 281/1993
Provision at issue whose validity and application were determined in the operative order.
art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă
Procedural basis cited to establish the binding nature of the decision.
AI generated
Decizia nr. 27/2015
Teaching staff installation allowance survives 2011 pay law as special rules non-abrogated
ICCJ_122506
Conflict between special salary law for teaching staff and unified public sector salary frameworks
Decizia nr. 5135/2013
Legality of 2011 public sector salary re-graduation norms requiring 15% increase on post-25%-reduction baseline
Decizia nr. 3505/2014
Legality of salary calculation norms for public sector staff upheld; appeals allowed and lower court decision reformed
Decizia nr. 1536/2015
Legality of methodological salary calculation norms for 2011 public sector pay recovery

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
art. 6 din Legea nr. 63/2011

Provision at issue whose interpretation was requested and resolved in the operative order.

art. 23 din Hotărârea Guvernului nr. 281/1993

Provision at issue whose validity and application were determined in the operative order.

art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă

Procedural basis cited to establish the binding nature of the decision.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

ROMÂNIA

ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE ŞI JUSTIŢIE

Completul pentru dezlegarea unor chestiuni de drept

Minuta deciziei nr. 27 Dosar nr. 1701/1/2015

Şedinţa din 21 septembrie 2015

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

DECIDE:

Admite sesizarea formulată de Curtea de Apel Iaşi – Secţia Litigii de Muncă şi Asigurări Sociale în dosarul nr. 4092/99/2014 privind pronunţarea unei hotărâri prealabile şi, în consecinţă:

În interpretarea şi aplicarea dispoziţiilor art. 6 din Legea nr. 63/2011 privind încadrarea şi salarizarea în anul 2011 a personalului didactic şi didactic auxiliar din învăţământ, cu modificările ulterioare, stabileşte că aceste prevederi legale nu abrogă dispoziţiile art. 23 din Hotărârea Guvernului nr. 281/1993 cu privire la salarizarea personalului din unităţile bugetare, cu modificările ulterioare.

Obligatorie, potrivit dispoziţiilor art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă.

Pronunţată în şedinţă publică, astăzi 21.09.2015.