Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Sentința nr. 863/2009 AI generated

Withdrawal of prosecution complaint challenging refusal to open criminal proceedings for judicial corruption

Case Number Sentința nr. 863/2009
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome struck_off
Court Costs Borne by appellant
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Cassation and Justice accepted the withdrawal of the complaint filed by the petitioner and imposed a 30 lei judicial fee against them, resulting in the dismissal of the procedural action. The dispute involved a challenge under Article 2781 of the Code of Criminal Procedure against a prosecutor's resolution that declined to initiate criminal proceedings for the offense under Article 246 of the Penal Code against a specific judicial official. The decisive legal basis was the petitioner's voluntary withdrawal of the complaint, which triggered the procedural consequence of the court taking note of the act and obliging the party to bear the litigation costs pursuant to Article 192(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 2781 C. proc. pen, art. 246 C. pen, art. 192 alin. (2) C. proc. pen; Withdrawal of prosecution complaint challenging refusal to open criminal proceedings for judicial corruption: The dispute involved a challenge under Article 2781 of the Code of Criminal Procedure against a prosecutor's resolution that declined to initiate criminal proceedings for the offense under Article 246 of the Penal Code against a specific judicial official. The decisive legal basis was the petitioner's voluntary withdrawal of the complaint, which triggered the procedural consequence of the court taking note of the act and obliging the party to bear the litigation costs pursuant to Article 192(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

Keywords

AI generated
withdrawal of criminal complaint code of criminal procedure opening of proceedings recusal of public prosecutor corruption offences open procedure

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 2781 C. proc. pen
a formulat plângere la această instanţă, în temeiul art. 2781 C. proc. pen., împotriva rezoluţiei nr.
art. 246 C. pen
13/P/2009 din 3 martie 2009 a Parchetului de pe lângă Înalta Curte de Casaţie şi Justiţie, secţia parchetelor militare, prin care s-a dispus neînceperea urmăririi penale sub aspectul săvârşirii infracţiunii prevăzute de art. 246 C. pen., faţă de şeful Secţiei Parchetelor Militare.
art. 192 alin. (2) C. proc. pen
Procedural basis cited in the dispositive to impose judicial costs on the petitioner following the withdrawal of the complaint.
AI generated
Sentința nr. 743/2010
Withdrawal of complaint regarding non-initiation of criminal proceedings against prosecutor
Sentința nr. 1316/2009
Withdrawal of complaint against prosecutor’s refusal to institute criminal proceedings
Sentința nr. 862/2013
Withdrawal of complaint against prosecutor's refusal to initiate criminal proceedings accepted; judicial costs imposed on petitioner
Sentința nr. 1708/2009
Withdrawal of criminal complaint against prosecutorial resolution and allocation of judicial costs
Sentința nr. 511/2010
Petitioner's withdrawal of criminal complaint against prosecutor's non-initiation order regarding magistrates' alleged abuse of office

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
art. 192 alin. (2) C. proc. pen.

Procedural basis cited in the dispositive to impose judicial costs on the petitioner following the withdrawal of the complaint.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Asupra plângerii de faţă;

În baza lucrărilor din dosar, constată următoarele:

Petiţionarul S.L. a formulat plângere la această instanţă, în temeiul art. 2781 C. proc. pen., împotriva rezoluţiei nr. 13/P/2009 din 3 martie 2009 a Parchetului de pe lângă Înalta Curte de Casaţie şi Justiţie, secţia parchetelor militare, prin care s-a dispus neînceperea urmăririi penale sub aspectul săvârşirii infracţiunii prevăzute de art. 246 C. pen., faţă de şeful Secţiei Parchetelor Militare.

Prin cererea scrisă depusă pentru termenul din 29 aprilie 2009, petiţionarul S.L. şi-a retras plângerea formulată în temeiul art. 2781 C. proc. pen.

Înalta Curte va luat act de manifestarea de voinţă a petiţionarului şi în conformitate cu prevederile art. 192 alin. (2) C. proc. pen., îl va obliga la plata cheltuielilor judiciare către stat.

PENTRU ACESTE MOTIVE

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

H O T Ă R Ă Ş T E

Ia act de retragerea plângerii formulată de petiţionarul S.L. împotriva rezoluţiei din 3 martie 2009 a Parchetului de pe lângă Înalta Curte de Casaţie şi Justiţie, secţia parchetelor militare, dată în Dosarul nr. 13/P/2009.

Obligă petiţionarul la 30 lei cheltuieli judiciare către stat.

Definitivă.

Pronunţată în şedinţă publică, azi 29 aprilie 2009.