Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Decizia nr. 1013/2015 AI generated

Transfer request sent to Court of Appeal for tribunal-level case; High Court declines jurisdiction.

Case Number Decizia nr. 1013/2015
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice declined jurisdiction and transferred the case to the Court of Appeal Craiova, which prevailed on the procedural question; no substantive ruling was made. The applicants had requested the transfer (strămutare) of a lower court case from the Craiova Court on grounds of legitimate suspicion, invoking the new Civil Procedure Code. The Court held that under Article 142(1) of the Civil Procedure Code (Law No. 134/2010), a transfer request based on legitimate suspicion is within the jurisdiction of the court of appeal when the court from which transfer is sought is a district court or tribunal in its circuit; therefore, since the underlying case was pending before the Craiova Court, jurisdiction lay with the Court of Appeal Craiova, not the High Court, and the decision was final with no appeal.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 142 C. proc. civ, art. 131 raportat la art. 142 C. proc. civ; Transfer request sent to Court of Appeal for tribunal-level case; High Court declines jurisdiction: The applicants had requested the transfer (strămutare) of a lower court case from the Craiova Court on grounds of legitimate suspicion, invoking the new Civil Procedure Code. The Court held that under Article 142(1) of the Civil Procedure Code (Law No. 134/2010), a transfer request based on legitimate suspicion is within the jurisdiction of the court of appeal when the court from which transfer is sought is a district court or tribunal in its circuit; therefore, since the underlying case was pending before the Craiova Court, jurisdiction lay with the Court of Appeal Craiova, not the High Court, and the decision was final with no appeal.

Keywords

AI generated
declining of jurisdiction Civil Procedure Code grounds for cassation transfer rendered moot e-justice matter in dispute

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 142 C. proc. civ
131 raportat la art. 142 C. proc. civ., urmează a declina competenţa de soluţionare a cauzei în favoarea Curţii de Apel Craiova.
art. 131 raportat la art. 142 C. proc. civ
Used in the dispositive to decline jurisdiction over the request for transfer of case in favor of the Court of Appeal Craiova.
AI generated
Decizia nr. 113/2018
Case transfer request on legitimate suspicion: jurisdiction declined and referred to Court of Appeal
Decizia nr. 1422/2017
Jurisdictional competence for transfer of case due to legitimate suspicion: Court of Appeal vs. High Court under Civil Procedure Code Art. 142
Decizia nr. 1997/2020
Transfer request for legitimate suspicion referred to Court of Appeal Craiova; High Court declinest jurisdiction.
Decizia nr. 1482/2020
Declining jurisdiction over transfer request based on legitimate suspicion as belonging to the Court of Appeal per Civil Procedure Code Articles 132 and 142
Decizia nr. 1548/2020
Transfer request referred to Galați Court of Appeal; High Court declines jurisdiction under Article 142(1) C. proc. civ.

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
art. 131 raportat la art. 142 C. proc. civ.

Used in the dispositive to decline jurisdiction over the request for transfer of case in favor of the Court of Appeal Craiova.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Constata că prin cererea înregistrată pe rolul Înaltei Curii de Casaţie şi Justiţie, secţia I civilă, la data de 16 martie 2015, petenţii au solicitat strămutarea dosarului nr. 18331/215/2014 al Judecătoriei Craiova ia o altă instanţă egală în grad.

Petenţii şi-au întemeiat cererea de strămutare pe motive de bănuială legitimă.

Cum dosarul a cărui strămutare se solicită, a fost înregistrat pe rolul Judecătoriei Craiova la data de 15 mai 2014, sunt incidente dispoziţiile Codului de procedură civilă aprobat prin Legea nr. 134/2010, potrivit art. 24 din acest act normativ.

Astfel, potrivit art. 142 alin. (1) Noul Cod proc. civ., „cererea de strămutare întemeiată pe motive de bănuială legitimă este de competenţa curţii de apel, dacă instanţa de la care se cere strămutarea este o judecătorie sau un tribunal din circumscripţia acesteia”.

Din perspectiva dispoziţiilor legale sus evocate, având în vedere că dosarul a cărui strămutare se solicită este al Judecătoriei Craiova, Înalta Curte, în temeiul art. 131 raportat la art. 142 C. proc. civ., urmează a declina competenţa de soluţionare a cauzei în favoarea Curţii de Apel Craiova.

PENTRU ACESTE MOTIVE,

ÎN NUMELE LEGII,

D E C I D E

Declină competenţa de soluţionare a cererii de strămutare a dosarului nr. 18331/215/2014 al Judecătoriei Craiova, formulată de petenţii D.L.S. şi D.M., în contradictoriu cu intimata A.P.N.T., în favoarea Curţii de Apel Craiova.

Fără cale de atac.

Pronunţată în şedinţă publică, astăzi, 3 aprilie 2015.