Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Sentința nr. 988/2009 AI generated

Admissibility of complaint against prosecutor's dismissal resolution restricted to non-referral decisions under Art. 2781 Code of Criminal Procedure

Case Number Sentința nr. 988/2009
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Court Costs Borne by appellant
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice rejected the petitioner's complaint as inadmissible and ordered the petitioner to pay 200 lei in judicial costs to the state, thereby upholding the Prosecutor's Office's prior decision to dismiss the original complaint as unfounded. The dispute arose from a complaint filed against specific judges of the Bucharest Court of Appeal for alleged abuse of power and judicial falsification due to their failure to comply with the petitioner's requests, a matter initially dismissed by the Prosecutor's Office for failing to meet the legal requirements of a criminal complaint or denunciation. The Court determined that the petition was procedurally inadmissible because, under Article 2781 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, a complaint to the judge is permissible only against a prosecutor's resolution of non-referral to trial, not against a resolution dismissing a complaint as unfounded; consequently, the petitioner was also charged with judicial expenses pursuant to Article 192(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 249 C. pen, art. 222 C. proc. pen, art. 223 C. proc. pen, art. 2781 C. proc. pen, art. 192 alin. (2) C. proc. pen; Admissibility of complaint against prosecutor's dismissal resolution restricted to non-referral decisions under Art. 2781 Code of Criminal Procedure: The dispute arose from a complaint filed against specific judges of the Bucharest Court of Appeal for alleged abuse of power and judicial falsification due to their failure to comply with the petitioner's requests, a matter initially dismissed by the Prosecutor's Office for failing to meet the legal requirements of a criminal complaint or denunciation. The Court determined that the petition was procedurally inadmissible because, under Article 2781 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, a complaint to the judge is permissible only against a prosecutor's resolution of non-referral to trial, not against a resolution dismissing a complaint as unfounded; consequently, the petitioner was also charged with judicial expenses pursuant to Article 192(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

Keywords

AI generated
criminal complaint matter in dispute abuse of power lack of prosecutorial standing referral order e-justice

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 249 C. pen
art. 222 C. proc. pen
Procurorul a constatat că în cauză nu sunt întrunite dispoziţiile legale aplicabile în materia plângerii sau a denunţului respectiv dispoziţiile art. 222 C. proc. pen.
art. 223 C. proc. pen
şi art. 223 C. proc. pen.
art. 2781 C. proc. pen
The court declared the complaint inadmissible because the provision limits appeals to the judge to prosecutor resolutions of non-referral to trial, which was not the case here.
art. 192 alin. (2) C. proc. pen
The court ordered the petitioner to pay judicial costs to the state based on this provision regarding the obligation to pay costs in unsuccessful cases.
AI generated
Decizia nr. 1664/2005
Admissibility of judicial complaint against prosecutor under Art. 2781 C. proc. pen. absent a resolution of non-prosecution
Sentința nr. 1479/2010
Admissibility of a complaint against a prosecution resolution under Art. 2781 C. proc. pen. limited to non-referral to court decisions
Sentința nr. 1922/2009
Admissibility of judicial appeal against prosecutor's dismissal of criminal complaint for non-referral to trial
Sentința nr. 2014/2009
Inadmissibility of appeal against prosecutor's resolution to reject complaint for professional misconduct, absent specific non-referal decision.
Decizia nr. 185/2011
Inadmissibility of criminal complaint for challenging prosecutor's resolution under Article 2781 CPP where no decision of non-referral to court was communicated

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
art. 2781 C. proc. pen.

The court declared the complaint inadmissible because the provision limits appeals to the judge to prosecutor resolutions of non-referral to trial, which was not the case here.

art. 192 alin. (2) C. proc. pen.

The court ordered the petitioner to pay judicial costs to the state based on this provision regarding the obligation to pay costs in unsuccessful cases.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Asupra plângerii de faţă;

În baza lucrărilor din dosar, constată următoarele:

Prin rezoluţia nr. 5156/1157/VIII/1/2009 Parchetul de pe lângă Înalta Curte de Casaţie şi Justiţie a respins ca neîntemeiată plângerea formulată de petentul M.C.V.

Petentul a solicitat cercetarea unor magistraţi, judecători de la Curtea de Apel Bucureşti, secţia a II-a penală şi pentru cauze cu minori şi de familie, ale căror nume sunt indescifrabile, pentru săvârşirea infracţiunilor prevăzute şi pedepsite de art. 246, art. 264, art. 249 C. pen. deoarece nu au dat curs solicitărilor sale.

Conţinutul plângerii formulate de petent este indescifrabil, situaţia de fapt nu a fost redată clar şi coerent.

Procurorul a constatat că în cauză nu sunt întrunite dispoziţiile legale aplicabile în materia plângerii sau a denunţului respectiv dispoziţiile art. 222 C. proc. pen. şi art. 223 C. proc. pen.

Împotriva acestei rezoluţii, petentul a formulat plângere adresându-se Înaltei Curţi de Casaţie şi Justiţie.

Plângerea este inadmisibilă.

În temeiul art. 2781 C. proc. pen. plângerea în faţa judecătorului se poate face numai împotriva rezoluţiilor sau ordonanţelor procurorului de netrimitere în judecată.

Petentul a formulat plângere împotriva unei rezoluţii prin care s-a respins ca neîntemeiată plângerea.

Conform art. 192 alin. (2) C. proc. pen. va fi obligat petentul la cheltuieli judiciare statului.

PENTRU ACESTE MOTIVE

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

H O T Ă R Ă Ş T E

Respinge, ca inadmisibilă, plângerea formulată de petiţionarul M.C.V. împotriva lucrării nr. 5156/1157/VIII/1/2009 din 6 martie 2009 a Parchetului de pe lângă Înalta Curte de Casaţie şi Justiţie, secţia de urmărire penală şi criminalistică.

Obligă petiţionarul la plata sumei de 200 lei, cu titlu de cheltuieli judiciare către stat.

Cu recurs.

Pronunţată în şedinţă publică, azi 15 mai 2009.