Withdrawal of criminal complaint for abuse in service and corruption triggering statutory judicial expenses
Romania (RO)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe High Court of Cassation and Justice took note of the complainant's withdrawal of the criminal complaint, rendering the decision definitive and ordering the complainant to pay 300 RON in judicial expenses to the state, of which 100 RON was advanced by the Ministry of Justice to cover the fees of the court-appointed defense attorney. The dispute involved a private criminal complaint filed for the offenses of abuse in office against the interests of persons and corruption against three defendants, which the complainant voluntarily retracted during the hearing after the case was registered. The procedural outcome was governed by Article 192(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, which provides for the termination of proceedings and the acceptance of the complainant's declaration of withdrawal.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedart. 192 alin. (2) C. proc. pen; Withdrawal of criminal complaint for abuse in service and corruption triggering statutory judicial expenses: The dispute involved a private criminal complaint filed for the offenses of abuse in office against the interests of persons and corruption against three defendants, which the complainant voluntarily retracted during the hearing after the case was registered. The procedural outcome was governed by Article 192(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, which provides for the termination of proceedings and the acceptance of the complainant's declaration of withdrawal.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedRelated Decisions
AI generatedKey legal questions extracted by Legislator
AI generatedProcedural rule applied to take act of the complainant's declaration of withdrawal of the criminal complaint.
Full text
Asupra plângerii de faţă;
În baza lucrărilor din dosar, constată următoarele:
Prin cererea înregistrată pe rolul acestei instanţe sub nr. 2461/1/2009 petentul C.M. a formulat plângere penală împotriva numiţilor R.V., A.D.M. şi D.C. solicitând efectuarea de cercetări sub aspectul săvârşirii infracţiunilor de abuz în serviciu contra intereselor persoanelor şi corupţie.
Cu prilejul dezbaterilor, petentul, personal, a declarat că înţelege să-şi retragă plângerea formulată.
Având în vedere manifestarea de voinţă a petentului C.M., Înalta Curte urmează să ia act de declaraţia de retragere a plângerii formulate.
Văzând şi dispoziţiile art. 192 alin. (2) C. proc. pen.;
PENTRU ACESTE MOTIVE
ÎN NUMELE LEGII
H O T Ă R Ă Ş T E
Ia act de declaraţia de retragere a plângerii formulată de petiţionarul C.M.
Obligă petiţionarul la plata sumei de 300 lei, cu titlul de cheltuieli judiciare către stat, din care suma de 100 lei, reprezentând onorariul apărătorului desemnat din oficiu, se va avansa din fondul Ministerului Justiţiei şi Libertăţilor Cetăţeneşti.
Definitivă.
Pronunţată în şedinţă publică, azi 27 aprilie 2009.