Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Decizia nr. 3020/2008 AI generated

Groundless appeal annulled for failure to state illegality; appellate remand of damages claim stands.

Case Number Decizia nr. 3020/2008
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court annulled the appeal (recurs) filed by the defendant against the appellate decision of the Craiova Court of Appeal, because the appeal failed to state any grounds of illegality as required by Article 302¹(1)(c) and Article 304 of the Civil Procedure Code. The appellate decision remains in force: it had partially overturned the first-instance judgment (upholding the claimant association’s appeal) and remanded the damages claim to the Mehedinți Tribunal for retrial. The dispute involved a request for damages by a property owners’ association against a commercial company, but the Supreme Court’s ruling was purely procedural—it did not address the merits, holding the appeal void for non-compliance with mandatory form requirements.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 3021 alin. (1) lit. c) C. proc. Civ, art. 304 C. proc. civ, art. 3021 C. proc. civ; Groundless appeal annulled for failure to state illegality; appellate remand of damages claim stands: The appellate decision remains in force: it had partially overturned the first-instance judgment (upholding the claimant association’s appeal) and remanded the damages claim to the Mehedinți Tribunal for retrial. The dispute involved a request for damages by a property owners’ association against a commercial company, but the Supreme Court’s ruling was purely procedural—it did not address the merits, holding the appeal void for non-compliance with mandatory form requirements.

Keywords

AI generated
standing to appeal civil annulment grounds for cassation article of civil procedure commercial dispute procedural orders

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 3021 alin. (1) lit. c) C. proc. Civ
Potrivit art. 3021 alin. (1) lit. c) C. proc. Civ.
art. 304 C. proc. civ
Cererea de recurs care face obiectul prezentului dosar nu cuprinde indicarea motivelor de nelegalitate prevăzute in mod expres de art. 304 C. proc. civ.
art. 3021 C. proc. civ
Basis for declaring the appeal null because it did not state the grounds for illegality.
AI generated
Decizia nr. 6885/2011
State appeal annulled for undeveloped grounds, appellate remand stands.
Decizia nr. 2323/2010
Appeal annulled as void for failure to state statutory illegality grounds; appellate judgment stands
Decizia nr. 1542/2019
Appeal annulled for failure to state statutory grounds of illegality.
Decizia nr. 678/2023
Appeal for failure to state grounds of illegality annulled in land restitution suspension dispute.
Decizia nr. 2346/2020
Appeal annulled for failure to frame illegality grounds; unsigned judgment copy not a ground for cassation

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
Art. 3021 C. proc. civ.

Basis for declaring the appeal null because it did not state the grounds for illegality.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Asupra cererii de recurs de faţă,

Din examinarea lucrărilor din dosar constată că, prin decizia nr. 23 din 29 ianuarie 2008 a Curţii de Apel Craiova, secţia comercială, s-a admis apelul formulat de reclamanta Asociaţia de proprietari nr. 25 K., s-a respins apelul pârâtei SC F.C. SRL s-a desfiinţat în parte sentinţa atacată, cauza fiind trimisă spre rejudecarea în fond a capătului de cerere având ca obiect despăgubiri, Tribunalului Mehedinţi.

Împotriva deciziei mai sus menţionate a declarat recurs pârâta.

Recursul nu a fost motivat nici în fapt şi nici în drept.

Potrivit art. 3021 alin. (1) lit. c) C. proc. Civ. cererea de recurs va cuprinde, sub sancţiunea nulităţii motivele de nelegalitate pe care se întemeiază recursul si dezvoltarea lor sau, după caz, menţiunea ca motivele vor fi depuse printr-un memoriu separat.

Cererea de recurs care face obiectul prezentului dosar nu cuprinde indicarea motivelor de nelegalitate prevăzute in mod expres de art. 304 C. proc. civ.

Având in vedere cele arătate urmează a se constata nulitatea recursului formulat de pârâta SC F.C. SRL Drobeta Turnu Severin împotriva deciziei nr. 23 din 29 ianuarie 2008 a Curţii de Apel Craiova, secţia comercială, întrucât nu respectă condiţiile cerute în mod imperativ de art. 3021 C. proc. civ.

PENTRU ACESTE MOTIVE

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

D E C I D E

Constată nul recursul declarat de pârâta SC F.C. SRL Drobeta Turnu Severin împotriva deciziei nr. 23 din 29 ianuarie 2008 a Curţii de Apel Craiova, secţia comercială.

Irevocabilă.

Pronunţată în şedinţa publică, astăzi 22 octombrie 2008.