Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Decizia nr. 3492/2014 AI generated

Legitimate-suspicion case transfer referred to Bucharest Court of Appeal

Case Number Decizia nr. 3492/2014
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice (Civil Section I) declined its jurisdiction and transferred the case to the Bucharest Court of Appeal, which is the operative outcome—the applicants' request to transfer Case No. 12169/300/2014 from the Sector 2 Bucharest Court of First Instance, based on legitimate suspicion, must be heard by the Court of Appeal. The dispute involved a procedural motion under the new Civil Procedure Code (Law No. 134/2010), where the applicants sought case transfer on grounds of legitimate suspicion. Decisively, under Article 342(1) of the Civil Procedure Code, such transfer requests are within the exclusive jurisdiction of the court of appeal when the originating court is a lower court (judecătorie or tribunal) within its circuit; hence, applying Articles 131 and 142, the High Court ruled itself materially incompetent and referred the matter to the Bucharest Court of Appeal, with no further appeal permitted.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 142 C. proc. civ, Art. 131 C. proc. civ; Legitimate-suspicion case transfer referred to Bucharest Court of Appeal: 12169/300/2014 from the Sector 2 Bucharest Court of First Instance, based on legitimate suspicion, must be heard by the Court of Appeal. The dispute involved a procedural motion under the new Civil Procedure Code (Law No. 134/2010), where the applicants sought case transfer on grounds of legitimate suspicion. Decisively, under Article 342(1) of the Civil Procedure Code, such transfer requests are within the exclusive jurisdiction of the court of appeal when the originating court is a lower court (judecătorie or tribunal) within its circuit; hence, applying Articles 131 and 142, the High Court ruled itself materially incompetent and referred the matter to the Bucharest Court of Appeal, with no further appeal permitted.

Keywords

AI generated
grounds of jurisdiction Civil Procedure Code transfer of evidence e-justice urgent suspicion of an offence detention for transfer

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 142 C. proc. civ
Basis for the declination of competence to the appellate court, as the competent authority for the transfer request.
Art. 131 C. proc. civ
Used to decline jurisdiction by checking the court's competence before proceeding.
AI generated
Decizia nr. 4756/2013
Transfer of case for legitimate suspicion referred to Bucharest Court of Appeal; High Court declines jurisdiction.
Decizia nr. 610/2016
Transfer of case for legitimate suspicion granted; Bucharest Court of Appeal vested to hear transfer request.
Decizia nr. 3481/2018
Transfer motion on legitimate suspicion referred to Bucharest Court of Appeal after high court declines jurisdiction
Decizia nr. 1652/2021
Transfer request for civil case: jurisdiction belongs to appellate court under legitimate suspicion grounds
Decizia nr. 3483/2018
Jurisdiction declined; legitimate-suspicion case transfer referred to Bucharest Court of Appeal.

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
Art. 131 C. proc. civ.

Used to decline jurisdiction by checking the court's competence before proceeding.

Art. 142 C. proc. civ.

Basis for the declination of competence to the appellate court, as the competent authority for the transfer request.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Constata că prin cererea înregistrată pe rolul Înaltei Curţi de Casaţie şi Justiţie, secţia I civilă, la data de 23 iulie 2014, petenţii B.L., B.D.M. (prin tutore B.L.) şi B.A. au solicitat strămutarea Dosarului nr. 12169/300/2014 al Judecătoriei sectorului 2 Bucureşti.

Petenţii şi-au întemeiat cererea de strămutare pe molive de bănuială legitimă.

Dosarul nr. 12169/300/2014, a cărui strămutare se solicită, a fost înregistrat pe rolul Judecătoriei sectorului 2 Bucureşti la data de 5 iunie 2014, fiind incidente dispoziţiile C. proc. civ. aprobat prin Legea nr. 134/2010.

Potrivit art. 342 alin. (1) Noul C. proc. civ., „cererea de strămutare întemeiată pe motive de bănuială legitimă este de competenţa curţii de apel, dacă instanţa de la care se cere strămutarea este o judecătorie sau un tribunal din circumscripţia acesteia (...)".

Pentru aceste considerente, în aplicarea dispoziţiilor art. 131 raportat la art. 142 C. proc. civ., instanţa competentă material a soluţiona cauza este Curtea de Apel Bucureşti, instanţă în favoarea căreia va opera prezenta declinare de competenţă.

PENTRU ACESTE MOTIVE

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

D E C I D E

Declină competenţa de soluţionare a cererii de strămutare a Dosarului nr. 12169/300/2014 al Judecătoriei sectorului 2 Bucureşti, formulată de petenţii B.L., B.D.M. şi B.A., în favoarea Curţii de Apel Bucureşti.

Fără cale de atac.

Pronunţată în şedinţă publică, astăzi, 5 decembrie 2014.