Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
ICCJ_120664 AI generated

Applicability of judicial salary ordinance to judges seconded to electoral offices

Case Number ICCJ_120664
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice dismissed as inadmissible the preliminary reference filed by an appellate court, thereby resolving the dispute regarding whether the salary provisions for judicial personnel under Emergency Governmental Ordinance no. 27/2006 (as amended) apply to judges seconded to electoral offices pursuant to Law no. 67/2004. The matter concerned the interpretation and application of Article 13(1)(a) of the cited ordinance to a specific employment status, but the court did not proceed to a substantive ruling on the merits due to procedural inadmissibility.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Applicability of judicial salary ordinance to judges seconded to electoral offices: 27/2006 (as amended) apply to judges seconded to electoral offices pursuant to Law no. 67/2004. The matter concerned the interpretation and application of Article 13(1)(a) of the cited ordinance to a specific employment status, but the court did not proceed to a substantive ruling on the merits due to procedural inadmissibility.

Keywords

AI generated
judicial law electoral law emergency ordinance matter in dispute preliminary decision employment status
AI generated
Decizia nr. 24/2015
Applicability of judicial salary ordinance for electoral bureau secondments vs. general government election cost regulations
Decizia nr. 72/2025
Preliminary reference on salary derogation for court auxiliary staff ruled inadmissible due to lack of genuine legal difficulty
Decizia nr. 105/2025
Eligibility for judicial police secondment allowances under Anti-Corruption Directorate assignments
Decizia nr. 3855/2022
Judicial salary equalization: applicability of maximum pay level and judicial precedents under amended public sector salary frameworks
Decizia nr. 5176/2023
Judges’ salary order issuance and inadmissibility of administrative action to enforce civil judgments

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE ŞI JUSTIŢIE

Completul pentru dezlegarea unor chestiuni de drept

Minuta deciziei nr.24 Dosar nr. 1406/1/2015

Şedinţa de la 29 iunie 2015

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

DECIDE:

Respinge, ca inadmisibilă, sesizarea formulată de Curtea de Apel Piteşti - Secţia a II-a civilă, de contencios administrativ şi fiscal, în dosarul nr. 3421/109/2013, privind pronunţarea unei hotărâri prealabile pentru dezlegarea modului de interpretare şi aplicare a prevederilor art. 13 alin. (1) lit. a) din Ordonanţa de urgenţă a Guvernului nr. 27/2006 privind salarizarea şi alte drepturi ale judecătorilor, procurorilor şi altor categorii de personal din sistemul justiţiei, aprobată cu modificări şi completări prin Legea nr. 45/2007, cu modificările şi completările ulterioare, respectiv dacă acestea sunt aplicabile şi în cazul detaşării judecătorilor la birourile electorale, detaşare realizată conform Legii nr. 67/2004 pentru alegerea autorităţilor administraţiei publice locale, republicată, cu modificările şi completările ulterioare.

Obligatorie, potrivit dispoziţiilor art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă.

Pronunţată în şedinţă publică, astăzi 29 iunie 2015.