Legislator Case Law & Legislation
ICCJ_120630 AI generated

Suspension of benefits during 2010 held not to extinguish underlying entitlement; statutory suspension construed.

Case Number ICCJ_120630
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice admitted the referral from the Pitești Court of Appeal and held, in a preliminary ruling on a question of law, that Article 9 of Law No. 118/2010 (concerning measures to restore budgetary balance) suspends only the *exercise* of the right to certain allowances or indemnities during 3 July–31 December 2010, not the *existence* of that right. The ruling, binding under Article 521(3) of the Civil Procedure Code, was issued in a case involving claims for unpaid benefits for that period, and clarifies that the statutory suspension does not extinguish the underlying entitlement to such payments.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art.9 din Legea nr.118/2010, art.521 alin.(3) din Codul de procedură civilă; Suspension of benefits during 2010 held not to extinguish underlying entitlement; statutory suspension construed: 118/2010 (concerning measures to restore budgetary balance) suspends only the *exercise* of the right to certain allowances or indemnities during 3 July–31 December 2010, not the *existence* of that right. The ruling, binding under Article 521(3) of the Civil Procedure Code, was issued in a case involving claims for unpaid benefits for that period, and clarifies that the statutory suspension does not extinguish the underlying entitlement to such payments.

Keywords

AI generated
suspension of benefit entitlement statutory benefit article of civil procedure interpretation of the law balance of payments preliminary ruling procedure

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art.9 din Legea nr.118/2010
Provision interpreted as the main subject of the preliminary ruling.
art.521 alin.(3) din Codul de procedură civilă
Basis for declaring the ruling binding on all courts.
AI generated

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
art.9 din Legea nr.118/2010

Provision interpreted as the main subject of the preliminary ruling.

art.521 alin.(3) din Codul de procedură civilă

Basis for declaring the ruling binding on all courts.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

ROMÂNIA

ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE ŞI JUSTIŢIE

Completul pentru dezlegarea unor chestiuni de drept

Minuta deciziei nr.16 Dosar nr.689/1/2015

Şedinţa de la 8 iunie 2015

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

DECIDE:

Admite sesizarea formulată de Curtea de Apel Piteşti - Secţia a II-a civilă, de contencios administrativ şi fiscal, prin Încheierea din 14 ianuarie 2015, pronunţată în dosarul nr.3036/109/2013, şi stabileşte că:

Dispoziţiile art.9 din Legea nr.118/2010 privind unele măsuri necesare în vederea restabilirii echilibrului bugetar, cu modificările şi completările ulterioare, vizează exerciţiul dreptului la acordarea ajutoarelor sau, după caz, indemnizaţiilor, în sensul că acesta este suspendat în perioada 3 iulie – 31 decembrie 2010, şi nu existenţa acestui drept.

Obligatorie, potrivit dispoziţiilor art.521 alin.(3) din Codul de procedură civilă.

Pronunţată în şedinţă publică, astăzi, 8 iunie 2015.