Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Decizia nr. 557/2008 AI generated

Perempted appeal leaves prior commercial ruling final and irrevocable

Case Number Decizia nr. 557/2008
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome struck_off
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court declared the appeal (recurs) filed by the defendant company against the Court of Appeal's decision of 22 November 2006 as perimated (extinguished by lapse of time), thereby upholding the prior decision as final and irrevocable. The dispute was a commercial matter, with the defendant's appeal having been suspended on 18 May 2007 under Article 242(2) of the Civil Procedure Code and left inactive for more than six months due to the parties' fault. The court applied Articles 248 and 252 of the Civil Procedure Code, which mandate automatic peremption of any claim left unresolved for six months through the parties' fault and allow for its finding either upon request or ex officio.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 242 pct. 2 C. proc. civ, art. 248 C. proc. civ, art. 252 C. proc. civ; Perempted appeal leaves prior commercial ruling final and irrevocable: The dispute was a commercial matter, with the defendant's appeal having been suspended on 18 May 2007 under Article 242(2) of the Civil Procedure Code and left inactive for more than six months due to the parties' fault. The court applied Articles 248 and 252 of the Civil Procedure Code, which mandate automatic peremption of any claim left unresolved for six months through the parties' fault and allow for its finding either upon request or ex officio.

Keywords

AI generated
peremption in commercial matters Civil Procedure Code matter in dispute commercial company urgent preliminary ruling procedure commercial arbitration

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 242 pct. 2 C. proc. civ
590 din 22 noiembrie 2006 pronunţată de Curtea de Apel Bucureşti, secţia a V-a comercială, a fost suspendat la data de 18 mai 2007, în baza art. 242 pct. 2 C. proc. civ.
art. 248 C. proc. civ
Used to establish that any request is extinguished by lapse of time if it has remained inactive for 6 months due to the parties' fault.
art. 252 C. proc. civ
Used to allow the court to find the extinguishment of the appeal ex officio.
AI generated
Decizia nr. 2295/2009
Peremption of commercial appeal for failure to prosecute within statutory period
Decizia nr. 3136/2009
Peremption of commercial appeal for failure to fulfill court-imposed obligations within six months
Decizia nr. 216/2003
Commercial appeal peremption due to inactivity exceeding six months after suspension of proceedings
Decizia nr. 2716/2009
Peremption of commercial appeal due to inactivity under Article 248 of the Civil Procedure Code
Decizia nr. 215/2003
Peremption of commercial appeal due to procedural inactivity

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
art. 248 C. proc. civ.

Used to establish that any request is extinguished by lapse of time if it has remained inactive for 6 months due to the parties' fault.

art. 252 C. proc. civ.

Used to allow the court to find the extinguishment of the appeal ex officio.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Asupra perimării recursului de faţă;

Din examinarea lucrărilor din dosar, constată că recursul declarat de pârâta SC C. SRL Bucureşti, împotriva Deciziei nr. 590 din 22 noiembrie 2006 pronunţată de Curtea de Apel Bucureşti, secţia a V-a comercială, a fost suspendat la data de 18 mai 2007, în baza art. 242 pct. 2 C. proc. civ. şi de la această dată a stat în nelucrare din culpa părţilor mai mult de 6 luni, nefăcându-se nici un act de procedură în vederea judecării.

Potrivit dispoziţiilor art. 248 C. proc. civ., orice cerere de chemare în judecată se perimă de drept, dacă a rămas în nelucrare din culpa părţilor 6 luni.

Conform art. 252 C. proc. civ., perimarea se constată la cerere sau din oficiu.

Fiind întrunite condiţiile legale prevăzute de aceste texte, urmează a se constata perimarea recursului declarat de pârâta SC C. SRL Bucureşti, împotriva Deciziei nr. 590 din 22 noiembrie 2006 a Curţii de Apel Bucureşti, secţia a V-a comercială.

PENTRU ACESTE MOTIVE

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

D E C I D E

Constată perimat recursul declarat de pârâta SC C. SRL Bucureşti împotriva Deciziei nr. 590 din 22 noiembrie 2006 a Curţii de Apel Bucureşti, secţia a V-a comercială.

Irevocabilă.

Pronunţată, în şedinţa publică, astăzi 15 februarie 2008.