Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Decizia nr. 128/2008 AI generated

Nullity of cassation appeal for failure to develop grounds under Code of Civil Procedure Articles 3021 and 299

Case Number Decizia nr. 128/2008
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice declared the appeal of the plaintiff null, thereby upholding the appellate decision that had dismissed the original civil action. The dispute involved a civil claim filed by an individual against multiple private parties and a limited liability company, which was initially rejected by the court of first instance and subsequently affirmed on appeal. The cassation court ruled that the appellant's petition was procedurally defective because it cited a ground for cassation without providing the requisite development and demonstration of the relevance of the arguments as mandated by procedural law, and no public order violations were present to warrant exception; consequently, the appeal was rejected under the statutory sanction of nullity for non-compliance with filing requirements.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 304 pct. 9 C. proc. civ, art. 3021 lit. c) C. proc. civ, art. 299 alin. (1) C. proc. civ, art. 3021 C. proc. civ, art. 306 alin. (2) C. proc. civ; Nullity of cassation appeal for failure to develop grounds under Code of Civil Procedure Articles 3021 and 299: The dispute involved a civil claim filed by an individual against multiple private parties and a limited liability company, which was initially rejected by the court of first instance and subsequently affirmed on appeal. The cassation court ruled that the appellant's petition was procedurally defective because it cited a ground for cassation without providing the requisite development and demonstration of the relevance of the arguments as mandated by procedural law, and no public order violations were present to warrant exception; consequently, the appeal was rejected under the statutory sanction of nullity for non-compliance with filing requirements.

Keywords

AI generated
procedural nullity Civil Procedure Code grounds for cassation public order grounds filing of a claim statutory requirement

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 304 pct. 9 C. proc. civ
Este de observat că, deşi a invocat în susţinerea recursului dispoziţiile art. 304 pct. 9 C. proc. civ., recurentul nu a dezvoltat acest motiv conform cerinţelor art.
art. 3021 lit. c) C. proc. civ
Basis for declaring the appeal null due to the appellant's failure to develop the grounds for cassation as required by procedural law.
art. 299 alin. (1) C. proc. civ
Procedural rule defining the scope of the cassation appeal, which the appellant failed to address in their submission.
art. 3021 C. proc. civ
civ., recurentul nu a dezvoltat acest motiv conform cerinţelor art. 3021 lit.
art. 306 alin. (2) C. proc. civ
AI generated
Decizia nr. 1401/2013
Nullity of cassation appeal for failure to develop specific legal grounds under Article 3021(1)(c) of the Code of Civil Procedure
Decizia nr. 2720/2010
Nullity of cassation appeal for failure to articulate grounds under Article 3021(1)(c) of the Code of Civil Procedure
Decizia nr. 4964/2012
Nullity of cassation appeal for failure to articulate specific grounds of illegality under Civil Procedure Code
Decizia nr. 3124/2008
Nullity of cassation appeal for failure to develop revision grounds against a commercial judgment
Decizia nr. 631/2019
Nullity of cassation appeal for failure to develop grounds of illegality under Article 302¹(1)(c) and Article 306(1) of the Code of Civil Procedure

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
art. 3021 lit. c) C. proc. civ.

Basis for declaring the appeal null due to the appellant's failure to develop the grounds for cassation as required by procedural law.

art. 299 alin. (1) C. proc. civ.

Procedural rule defining the scope of the cassation appeal, which the appellant failed to address in their submission.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Asupra recursului de faţă,

Din examinarea lucrărilor din dosar, constată următoarele:

Prin sentinţa civilă nr. 734, pronunţată la data de 23 februarie 2007, Tribunalul Braşov a respins acţiunea formulată de reclamantul G.S., în contradictoriu cu pârâţii G.V., G.M., G.H. şi SC I. SRL.

Apelul declarat de reclamant împotriva sentinţei tribunalului a fost respins, ca nefondat, de Secţia comercială a Curţii de Apel Braşov, prin decizia nr. 108/ Ap, pronunţată la data de 29 iunie 2007.

Împotriva menţionatei decizii a formulat recurs apelantul reclamant G.S.

Este de observat că, deşi a invocat în susţinerea recursului dispoziţiile art. 304 pct. 9 C. proc. civ., recurentul nu a dezvoltat acest motiv conform cerinţelor art. 3021 lit. c) C. proc. civ. şi nu a precizat relevanţa pe care o au afirmaţiile vizând fondul cauzei şi criticile aduse instanţei de fond, faţă de decizia atacată şi de dispoziţiile art. 299 alin. (1) C. proc. civ., care statuează asupra obiectului recursului.

Aşa fiind, cum casarea sau modificarea deciziei atacate este posibilă numai în cazurile prevăzute de art. 304 pct. 1 – 9 C. proc. civ., iar, conform alin. (1) al art. 3021 C. proc. civ., cererea de recurs trebuie să cuprindă, sub sancţiunea nulităţii, motivele de nelegalitate pe care se sprijină şi dezvoltarea lor, constatând că recurentul nu s-a conformat acestor dispoziţii legale şi având în vedere, deopotrivă, inexistenţa, în cauză, a motivelor de ordine publică, care să inducă incidenţa art. 306 alin. (2) C. proc. civ., Înalta Curte va aplica cererii sale de recurs evocata sancţiune.

PENTRU ACESTE MOTIVE

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

D E C I D E

Constată nul recursul declarat de reclamantul G.S. împotriva deciziei nr. 108 din 29 iunie 2007, pronunţată de Curtea de Apel Braşov.

Irevocabilă.

Pronunţată în şedinţă publică, astăzi 23 ianuarie 2008.