Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
ICCJ_119955 AI generated

Admissibility of preliminary ruling on coordination of Italian early release and Romanian conditional release fractions for transferred convicted persons

Case Number ICCJ_119955
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice, acting through its Panel for Resolving Questions of Law in Criminal Matters, dismissed as inadmissible the request for a preliminary ruling filed by the Court of Appeal of Galati, thereby leaving the referral unresolved. The dispute concerned the execution of a criminal sentence in Romania for a person definitively convicted and transferred from Italy, specifically whether the period of early release granted under Italian law should be deducted from the Romanian imposed sentence, counted as an already served period for calculating the minimum fraction required for conditional release under Romanian law, or should ensure the Romanian conditional release date does not exceed the Italian early release date. The court's decision was based on procedural grounds regarding the admissibility of the preliminary reference under Article 477(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, without addressing the substantive conflict regarding the harmonization of international sentence execution and domestic conditional release calculations.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Admissibility of preliminary ruling on coordination of Italian early release and Romanian conditional release fractions for transferred convicted persons: Obligatorie de la data publicării în Monitorul Oficial al României, Partea I, potrivit dispoziţiilor art. 477 alin. 3 Cod procedură penală.

Keywords

AI generated
conditional release preliminary decision preliminary ruling procedure foreign law grounds for cassation code of criminal procedure
AI generated
Decizia nr. 3532/2013
Transfer of incarcerated foreign convict to Romania: exclusion of early-release days from sentence calculation in international judicial cooperation
ICCJ_128525
Admissibility of preliminary ruling on temporal application of Penal Code to conditional release revocation and sentencing concurrence
ICCJ_121223
Admissibility of preliminary ruling request from non-final instance in appeal against recognition of foreign conviction
Decizia nr. 157/2022
Recognition of foreign early release orders and limits of execution appeal under Romanian criminal procedure
Încheierea nr. 158/2024
Jurisdictional conflict over recognition of foreign sentence reductions: Applicability of early release days granted by issuing state prior to transfer under Law 302/2004

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

R O M Â N I A

ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE ŞI JUSTIŢIE

COMPLETUL PENTRU DEZLEGAREA UNOR CHESTIUNI DE DREPT ÎN MATERIE PENALĂ

Minuta deciziei nr.18 Dosar nr.1098/1/2015

Şedinţa din 04 iunie 2015

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

D E C I D E:

Respinge, ca inadmisibilă, sesizarea formulată de Curtea de Apel Galați - Secţia penală şi pentru cauze cu Minori în dosarul nr.93/44/2015, privind pronunţarea unei hotărâri prealabile pentru dezlegarea următoarei chestiuni de drept: „în cazul persoanelor judecate şi condamnate definitiv în Italia, care au fost transferate în România în vederea continuării executării pedepsei şi care beneficiază de Ordonanţa de eliberare anticipată, durata eliberării anticipate se deduce din pedeapsa aplicată, se ia în considerare ca perioadă executată în calculul fracţiei minime obligatorii pentru liberare condiţionată potrivit legii române sau se va avea în vedere că data liberării condiţionate, potrivit legii române să nu depăşească data eliberării anticipate stabilite potrivit legii italiene".

Obligatorie de la data publicării în Monitorul Oficial al României, Partea I, potrivit dispoziţiilor art. 477 alin. 3 Cod procedură penală.

Pronunţată în şedinţă publică, astăzi, 04 iunie 2015.