Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Sentința nr. 1429/2010 AI generated

Criminal complaint withdrawal: unilateral act triggering judicial expense liability under Article 192(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure

Case Number Sentința nr. 1429/2010
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome struck_off
Court Costs Borne by appellant
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice took note of the complainant’s unilateral withdrawal of the criminal complaint and dismissed the case, ordering the complainant to pay 200 lei in judicial expenses to the state. The dispute involved a criminal complaint alleging multiple offenses, including abuse, abuse of power, and corruption, allegedly committed by prison authorities during the execution of the complainant’s custodial sentence for robbery; the complainant personally withdrew the complaint on the day of the hearing. The court relied on the doctrine that the withdrawal of a complaint is a unilateral act of will, applying Article 192(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure to mandate the collection of judicial costs from the withdrawing party.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 264 C. pen, art. 192 alin. (2) C. proc. pen; Criminal complaint withdrawal: unilateral act triggering judicial expense liability under Article 192(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure: The dispute involved a criminal complaint alleging multiple offenses, including abuse, abuse of power, and corruption, allegedly committed by prison authorities during the execution of the complainant’s custodial sentence for robbery; the complainant personally withdrew the complaint on the day of the hearing. The court relied on the doctrine that the withdrawal of a complaint is a unilateral act of will, applying Article 192(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure to mandate the collection of judicial costs from the withdrawing party.

Keywords

AI generated
withdrawal of criminal complaint code of criminal procedure liability for costs abuse of power hearing of the parties order to pay

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 264 C. pen
art. 192 alin. (2) C. proc. pen
Provision applied in the dispositive to order the petitioner to pay judicial expenses to the state following the withdrawal of the complaint.
AI generated
Sentința nr. 838/2009
Withdrawal of criminal complaint for abuse in service and corruption triggering statutory judicial expenses
Sentința nr. 830/2009
Withdrawal of criminal complaint accepted; complainant ordered to pay 100 lei costs.
Sentința nr. 743/2010
Withdrawal of complaint regarding non-initiation of criminal proceedings against prosecutor
Decizia nr. 240/2016
Withdrawal of execution complaint treated as valid unilateral act under Code of Criminal Procedure
Sentința nr. 1708/2009
Withdrawal of criminal complaint against prosecutorial resolution and allocation of judicial costs

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
art. 192 alin. (2) C. proc. pen.

Provision applied in the dispositive to order the petitioner to pay judicial expenses to the state following the withdrawal of the complaint.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Asupra plângerii de faţă;

În baza lucrărilor din dosar, constată următoarele:

Prin cererea introdusă la data de 30 iunie 2010 şi înregistrată sub nr. 5761/1/2010, petiţionarul G.G.I. a formulat plângere penală împotriva intimaţilor C.C.A., D.P. şi a directorului A.N.P. pentru săvârşirea infracţiunilor prevăzute de art. 247, art. 290, art. 193, art. 194, art. 267, art. 358, art. 250 şi art. 264 C. pen.

În motivarea plângerii, petentul a învederat că este supus unor abuzuri pretins săvârşite de intimaţi în legătură cu executarea pedepsei de 10 ani şi 6 luni închisoare la care a fost condamnat pentru săvârşirea infracţiunii de tâlhărie.

La data de 20 septembrie 2010, petentul personal a declarat că îşi retrage plângerea.

Ca atare, retragerea plângerii fiind un act unilateral de voinţă, urmează să se ia act de poziţia petentului, iar în baza art. 192 alin. (2) C. proc. pen., acesta va fi obligat la cheltuieli judiciare către stat.

PENTRU ACESTE MOTIVE

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

H O T Ă R Ă Ş T E

Ia act de retragerea plângerii formulată de petiţionarul G.G.I.

Obligă petiţionarul la plata sumei de 200 lei cu titlu de cheltuieli judiciare către stat.

Definitivă.

Pronunţată în şedinţă publică, azi 20 septembrie 2010.