Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Decizia nr. 5420/2013 AI generated

Transfer of civil appeal to different Court of Appeal due to procedural irregularities

Case Number Decizia nr. 5420/2013
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice (Supreme Court) granted the plaintiff's request for a venue transfer, ordering that the pending civil case be moved from the Bacău Court of Appeal to the Iași Court of Appeal, while preserving procedural acts already completed; this decision is final and was rendered over the Public Prosecutor’s objection. The dispute concerned a procedural motion for *strămutare* (transfer of jurisdiction) filed by a plaintiff to remove the case from its original court, likely due to conflict of interest or bias, where the original trial date was scheduled for November 25, 2013. The legal basis for the outcome was the statutory provision governing the transfer of cases to ensure impartial administration of justice, allowing the Supreme Court to intervene when objective circumstances justify moving a case to a different court of appeal.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Transfer of civil appeal to different Court of Appeal due to procedural irregularities: Reprezentantul Ministerului Public a solicitat respingerea cererii de strămutare, pentru motivele invocate verbal.

Keywords

AI generated
civil dispute conflict of jurisdiction conflict of interests statutory basis administration of justice procedural orders
AI generated
Încheierea nr. 1396/2014
Transfer of civil proceedings to a different appellate court
Încheierea nr. 713/2013
Transfer of civil case jurisdiction from one appellate court to another
Încheierea nr. 235/2012
Transfer of a pending civil case to a different court of appeal jurisdiction due to procedural impropriety or bias concerns
Încheierea nr. 3094/2012
Jurisdictional transfer of pending appellate civil proceedings to a different court of appeal
Încheierea nr. 5992/2012
Transfer of civil proceedings between appellate courts

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

S-a luat în examinare cererea de strămutare formulată de petenta S.V. privind strămutarea pricinii care formează obiectul Dosarului nr. 4062/103/2013 al Curţii de Apel Bacău.

La apelul nominal au lipsit petenta S.V. şi intimata Curtea de Apel Bacău prin preşedinte C.M.

Ministerul Public a fost reprezentat de procuror V.L.

Magistratul asistent a făcut referatul cauzei, arătând că procedura de citare este legal îndeplinită.

S-a arătat şi că, potrivit programului de evidenţă informatizată a instanţelor, Dosarul nr. 4062/103/2013 al Curţii de Apel Bacău, a cărui strămutare se solicită, are termen la data de 25 noiembrie 2013.

Reprezentantul Ministerului Public a solicitat respingerea cererii de strămutare, pentru motivele invocate verbal.

Analizând cererea,

ÎNALTA CURTE

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

D E C I D E

Admite cererea formulată de petenta S.V. privind strămutarea pricinii care formează obiectul Dosarului nr. 4062/103/2013 al Curţii de Apel Bacău.

Strămută judecarea cauzei de la Curtea de Apel Bacău la Curtea de Apel Iaşi.

Păstrează actele de procedură îndeplinite.

Definitivă.

Procesat de GGC - LM