Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Decizia nr. 2556/2014 AI generated

Transfer motion referred to Ploiești Court of Appeal under Art. 142(1) Civil Procedure Code.

Case Number Decizia nr. 2556/2014
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice (Civil Section I) declined its own jurisdiction and referred the motion to transfer a case (Dosar nr. 8231/281/2013, pending before the Ploiești Court) to the Ploiești Court of Appeal, ruling that the transfer request based on legitimate suspicion must be heard by the appellate court with territorial jurisdiction over the lower court, per Art. 142(1) of the Civil Procedure Code (Law No. 134/2010), since the case was filed after that code took effect and the lower court is a judecătorie within the appellate court's circuit. No appeal was permitted against this decision.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 142 alin. (1) C. proc. civ; Transfer motion referred to Ploiești Court of Appeal under Art. 142(1) Civil Procedure Code: 8231/281/2013, pending before the Ploiești Court) to the Ploiești Court of Appeal, ruling that the transfer request based on legitimate suspicion must be heard by the appellate court with territorial jurisdiction over the lower court, per Art. 142(1) of the Civil Procedure Code (Law No. 134/2010), since the case was filed after that code took effect and the lower court is a judecătorie within the appellate court's circuit. No appeal was permitted against this decision.

Keywords

AI generated
Civil Procedure Code transfer of competence territorial jurisdiction preliminary ruling procedure transfer of prisoners transfer of property

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 142 alin. (1) C. proc. civ
Used in the reasoning to determine jurisdiction over the transfer request, but not cited in the dispositive.
AI generated
Decizia nr. 2125/2019
Case transfer motion referred to Ploiești Court of Appeal based on territorial jurisdiction
Încheierea nr. 271/2017
Motion for transfer of jurisdiction between appellate courts
Decizia nr. 681/2017
Case transfer motion referred to Târgu Mureș Court of Appeal, with High Court declining jurisdiction
Decizia nr. 3481/2018
Transfer motion on legitimate suspicion referred to Bucharest Court of Appeal after high court declines jurisdiction
Decizia nr. 926/2016
Motion to transfer civil case on legitimate suspicion referred to Court of Appeal Iași for lack of jurisdiction.

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
Art. 142 alin. (1) C. proc. civ.

Used in the reasoning to determine jurisdiction over the transfer request, but not cited in the dispositive.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Constatând că se solicită strămutarea unui dosar aflat pe rolul Judecătoriei Târgu-Jiu, având ca obiect o acțiune formulată după data intrării în vigoare a Legii nr. 134/2010 privind noul C. proc. civ., în raport de dispozițiile art. 142 alin. (1) C. proc. civ., potrivit cărora „cererea de strămutare întemeiată pe motiv de bănuială legitimă este de competența curții de apel, dacă instanța de la care se cere strămutarea este o judecătorie sau un tribunal din circumscripția acesteia".

PENTRU ACESTE MOTIVE

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

D E C I D E

Declină competența de soluționare a cererii de strămutare a Dosarului nr. 8231/281/2013 al Judecătoriei Ploiești, formulată de petentul C.G., în favoarea Curții de Apel Ploiești.

Fără cale de atac.

Pronunțată în ședință publică, astăzi 2 octombrie 2014.