Residential lease duration question of law referral inadmissible on procedural grounds
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe High Court of Cassation and Justice (Înalta Curte de Casaţie şi Justiţie), sitting as a panel for the resolution of questions of law, dismissed as inadmissible the referral from the Timiş Tribunal seeking a preliminary ruling on the interpretation and application of the single article of Government Emergency Ordinance No. 44/2009, as approved by Law No. 309/2009, concerning the duration of residential lease contracts; the referral was rejected on procedural grounds, and no substantive ruling was given on the legal question, with the dismissal being binding under art. 521 para. (3) of the Civil Procedure Code. The case arose in litigation over the duration of a lease for housing premises, with the referring court questioning the legal rule governing lease terms, but the High Court found the referral failed to meet the statutory admissibility conditions for an advance ruling.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedart. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă; Residential lease duration question of law referral inadmissible on procedural grounds: 44/2009, as approved by Law No. 309/2009, concerning the duration of residential lease contracts; the referral was rejected on procedural grounds, and no substantive ruling was given on the legal question, with the dismissal being binding under art. 521 para. (3) of the Civil Procedure Code. The case arose in litigation over the duration of a lease for housing premises, with the referring court questioning the legal rule governing lease terms, but the High Court found the referral failed to meet the statutory admissibility conditions for an advance ruling.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedRelated Decisions
AI generatedKey legal questions extracted by Legislator
AI generatedThe court declared the referral mandatory for lower courts, according to the procedural provision cited in the dispositive.
Full text
ROMÂNIA
ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE ŞI JUSTIŢIE
Completul pentru dezlegarea unor chestiuni de drept
Minuta deciziei nr.3 Dosar nr. 14/1/2014/HP/C
Şedinţa de la 19 ianuarie 2015
ÎN NUMELE LEGII
DECIDE:
Respinge, ca inadmisibilă, sesizarea formulată de Tribunalul Timiş în dosarul nr. 273/325/2014 privind pronunţarea unei hotărâri prealabile pentru dezlegarea modului de interpretare şi aplicare a dispoziţiilor articolului unic din Ordonanţa de urgenţă a Guvernului nr. 44/2009 privind durata unor contracte de închiriere pentru suprafeţe locative cu destinaţia de locuinţe, aprobată prin Legea nr. 309/2009.
Obligatorie, potrivit dispoziţiilor art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă.
Pronunţată în şedinţă publică, astăzi 19 ianuarie 2015.