Legislator Case Law & Legislation
ICCJ_114067 AI generated

Residential lease duration question of law referral inadmissible on procedural grounds

Case Number ICCJ_114067
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice (Înalta Curte de Casaţie şi Justiţie), sitting as a panel for the resolution of questions of law, dismissed as inadmissible the referral from the Timiş Tribunal seeking a preliminary ruling on the interpretation and application of the single article of Government Emergency Ordinance No. 44/2009, as approved by Law No. 309/2009, concerning the duration of residential lease contracts; the referral was rejected on procedural grounds, and no substantive ruling was given on the legal question, with the dismissal being binding under art. 521 para. (3) of the Civil Procedure Code. The case arose in litigation over the duration of a lease for housing premises, with the referring court questioning the legal rule governing lease terms, but the High Court found the referral failed to meet the statutory admissibility conditions for an advance ruling.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă; Residential lease duration question of law referral inadmissible on procedural grounds: 44/2009, as approved by Law No. 309/2009, concerning the duration of residential lease contracts; the referral was rejected on procedural grounds, and no substantive ruling was given on the legal question, with the dismissal being binding under art. 521 para. (3) of the Civil Procedure Code. The case arose in litigation over the duration of a lease for housing premises, with the referring court questioning the legal rule governing lease terms, but the High Court found the referral failed to meet the statutory admissibility conditions for an advance ruling.

Keywords

AI generated
residential lease statutory grounds emergency government ordinance on-premises contracts Civil Procedure Code preliminary decision

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă
The court declared the referral mandatory for lower courts, according to the procedural provision cited in the dispositive.
AI generated

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă

The court declared the referral mandatory for lower courts, according to the procedural provision cited in the dispositive.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

ROMÂNIA

ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE ŞI JUSTIŢIE

Completul pentru dezlegarea unor chestiuni de drept

Minuta deciziei nr.3 Dosar nr. 14/1/2014/HP/C

Şedinţa de la 19 ianuarie 2015

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

DECIDE:

Respinge, ca inadmisibilă, sesizarea formulată de Tribunalul Timiş în dosarul nr. 273/325/2014 privind pronunţarea unei hotărâri prealabile pentru dezlegarea modului de interpretare şi aplicare a dispoziţiilor articolului unic din Ordonanţa de urgenţă a Guvernului nr. 44/2009 privind durata unor contracte de închiriere pentru suprafeţe locative cu destinaţia de locuinţe, aprobată prin Legea nr. 309/2009.

Obligatorie, potrivit dispoziţiilor art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedură civilă.

Pronunţată în şedinţă publică, astăzi 19 ianuarie 2015.