Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Încheierea nr. 3500/2012 AI generated

Appeal withdrawn by defendant; judicial expenses ordered; co-defendant's appeal adjourned due to counsel's absence

Case Number Încheierea nr. 3500/2012
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Court Costs Borne by appellant
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice (Criminal Section) took note of the withdrawal of the appeal filed by defendant F.D.R. against Criminal Decision No. 35/A of 13 February 2012 of the Bucharest Court of Appeal, First Criminal Section, ordering her to pay 900 RON in judicial expenses to the state (300 RON of which, representing the court-appointed lawyer's fee, to be advanced from the Ministry of Justice's fund); simultaneously, due to the court-appointed counsel's absence (mandatory defense under art. 171(3) of the Criminal Procedure Code), the court adjourned the co-defendant D.C.'s appeal against the same decision to 11 December 2012. The ruling is final.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 171 alin. (3) C. proc. pen, art. 369 C. proc. pen, art. 3854 raportat la art. 369 C. proc. pen; Appeal withdrawn by defendant; judicial expenses ordered; co-defendant's appeal adjourned due to counsel's absence: against Criminal Decision No. 35/A of 13 February 2012 of the Bucharest Court of Appeal, First Criminal Section, ordering her to pay 900 RON in judicial expenses to the state (300 RON of which, representing the court-appointed lawyer's fee, to be advanced from the Ministry of Justice's fund); simultaneously, due to the court-appointed counsel's absence (mandatory defense under art. 171(3) of the Criminal Procedure Code), the court adjourned the co-defendant D.C.'s appeal against the same decision to 11 December 2012. The ruling is final.

Keywords

AI generated
mandatory defense code of criminal procedure withdrawal of criminal complaint postponement of trial recusal of public prosecutor e-justice

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 171 alin. (3) C. proc. pen
Basis for postponing the case because the defendant's defense was mandatory.
art. 369 C. proc. pen
3854 raportat la art. 369 C. proc. pen., va lua act de manifestarea de voință a acesteia.
art. 3854 raportat la art. 369 C. proc. pen
Basis for taking note of the withdrawal of the appeal by the defendant F.D.R.
AI generated
Decizia nr. 900/2012
Criminal cassation appeal withdrawn; statutory costs and official counsel fees allocated
Decizia nr. 2929/2011
Withdrawal of criminal appeal following dismissal of retrial petition for defendant represented by counsel despite absence from trial
Decizia nr. 1098/2012
Withdrawal of criminal appeal accepted; judicial costs imposed on appellant
Decizia nr. 3992/2009
Appeal withdrawn; prior dismissal of complaint against prosecutor's no-prosecution order stands, costs to petitioner
Decizia nr. 3063/2012
Withdrawal of appeals leaves pretrial detention and judicial bail denial intact; defendants liable for court costs

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
art. 3854 raportat la art. 369 C. proc. pen.

Basis for taking note of the withdrawal of the appeal by the defendant F.D.R.

art. 171 alin. (3) C. proc. pen.

Basis for postponing the case because the defendant's defense was mandatory.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Față de imposibilitatea de prezentare a apărătorului ales al recurentului inculpat D.C., apărarea inculpatului fiind obligatorie, în conformitate cu dispozițiile art. 171 alin. (3) C. proc. pen. va dispune amânarea cauzei.

Având în vedere declarația de retragere a recursului formulată de recurenta inculpată F.D.R., față de disp. art. 3854 raportat la art. 369 C. proc. pen., va lua act de manifestarea de voință a acesteia.

D I S P U N E

Ia act de retragerea recursului declarat de inculpata F.D.R. împotriva deciziei penale nr. 35/A din 13 februarie 2012 a Curții de Apel București, secția I penală.

Obligă recurenta inculpată la plata sumei de 900 RON, cu titlu de cheltuieli judiciare către stat, din care suma de 300 RON, reprezentând onorariul apărătorului desemnat din oficiu, se va avansa din fondul Ministerului Justiției.

Fixează termen pentru soluționarea recursului declarat de inculpatul D.C. împotriva aceleiași decizii la data de 11 decembrie 2012.

Definitivă.

Recurentul inculpat, intimatele părți civile și intimatele părți vătămate nu vor mai fi citate, având termen în cunoștință.

Pronunțată, în ședință publică, azi, 30 octombrie 2012.