Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Decizia nr. 918/2004 AI generated

Unmotivated cassation appeal declared null in administrative dispute

Case Number Decizia nr. 918/2004
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice dismissed the appeal as null and void, leaving the prior appellate decision in force, after finding the appellant's procedural challenge fundamentally defective. The dispute involved an administrative law matter where the appellant filed a cassation appeal against a decision of the Bucharest Court of Appeal, but the appellant failed to provide legal grounds for the appeal and subsequently consumed the single allowed opportunity for a hearing postponement due to unrepresented parties. The court applied Articles 156(1), 303(1), and 306 of the Civil Procedure Code, determining that an unmotivated appeal request, coupled with the exhaustion of the limited procedural extensions for defense, results in the automatic nullity of the appeal, thereby precluding any substantive review of the administrative issue.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 306 C. proc. civ, art. 156 (1) C. proc. civ, art. 303 (1) C. proc. civ; Unmotivated cassation appeal declared null in administrative dispute: The dispute involved an administrative law matter where the appellant filed a cassation appeal against a decision of the Bucharest Court of Appeal, but the appellant failed to provide legal grounds for the appeal and subsequently consumed the single allowed opportunity for a hearing postponement due to unrepresented parties. The court applied Articles 156(1), 303(1), and 306 of the Civil Procedure Code, determining that an unmotivated appeal request, coupled with the exhaustion of the limited procedural extensions for defense, results in the automatic nullity of the appeal, thereby precluding any substantive review of the administrative issue.

Keywords

AI generated
procedural nullity grounds for cassation challenge of administrative decisions Civil Procedure Code matter in dispute hearing of the parties

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 306 C. proc. civ
Sanctioning provision that establishes the nullity of the appeal for being unmotivated in the request.
art. 156 (1) C. proc. civ
Justifies the denial of a second postponement for lack of defense, contributing to the procedural failure that led to the nullity.
art. 303 (1) C. proc. civ
Basis for declaring the appeal null due to the lack of legal grounds in the initial petition.
AI generated
Decizia nr. 2001/2023
Unmotivated cassation appeal against administrative tax challenge declared null
Decizia nr. 1542/2022
Nullity of cassation appeal for failure to develop specific legal grounds against the first-instance decision
Decizia nr. 3275/2025
Nullity of cassation appeal for lack of motivation regarding revision of inadmissibility of administrative judgment
Decizia nr. 39/2024
Nullity of cassation appeal for lack of motivation in administrative and fiscal litigation
Decizia nr. 157/2003
Unmotivated cassation appeal declared null due to failure to submit grounds within the statutory deadline

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
art. 156 (1) C. proc. civ.

Justifies the denial of a second postponement for lack of defense, contributing to the procedural failure that led to the nullity.

art. 303 (1) C. proc. civ.

Basis for declaring the appeal null due to the lack of legal grounds in the initial petition.

art. 306 C. proc. civ.

Sanctioning provision that establishes the nullity of the appeal for being unmotivated in the request.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Asupra recursului de față;

Din examinarea lucrărilor din dosar, constată următoarele:

Prin cererea înregistrată la 27 iunie 2003 la Curtea de Apel București, M.K.A., a declarat recurs împotriva Hotârârii nr. 448/2 aprilie 2003 pronunțată de Curtea de Apel București.

Cererea de recurs este nemotivată. Până la termenul de 3 decembrie 2003 acordat pentru judecarea cererii, recurentul și-a timbrat legal cererea de recurs. Cauza a fost amânată pentru termenul din 3 martie la cererea recurentului care a solicitat termen pentru lipsă de apărare, recurentul cerând un nou termen de lipsă de apărare la termenul din 3 martie 2004.

Față de această situație, în raport de dispozițiile art. 156 (1) C. proc. civ. (instanța va putea da un singur termen pentru lipsă de apărare temeinic motivată), de art. 303 (1) și art. 306 C. proc. civ. ce sancționează cu nulitatea nemotivarea recursului prin însăși cererea de recurs, instanța urmează a dispune nulitatea cererii de recurs.

PENTRU ACESTE MOTIVE

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

DECIDE:

Constată nul recursul declarat de M.K.A. împotriva sentinței civile nr. 488 din 2 aprilie 2003 a Curții de Apel București, secția de contencios administrativ.

Pronunțată în ședință publică, astăzi 3 martie 2004.