Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Încheierea nr. 705/2014 AI generated

Transfer of jurisdiction request dismissed: procedural requirements for strămutare not met

Case Number Încheierea nr. 705/2014
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice dismissed the petitioner's motion for the transfer of jurisdiction (striimutare), thereby upholding the competence of the Pitești Court of Appeal and leaving the original court as the forum for the proceedings. The case involved a procedural request to transfer civil file No. 1845/46/2013 from the Pitești Court of Appeal to another competent court, submitted after both the petitioner and the respondent failed to appear at the hearing. The dismissal was based on the legal finding that the procedural requirements for a transfer were not met, with the Public Ministry arguing against the transfer and the Court sustaining that the initial allocation of jurisdiction remained valid and lawful.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 124 CPC; Transfer of jurisdiction request dismissed: procedural requirements for strămutare not met: The case involved a procedural request to transfer civil file No. 1845/46/2013 from the Pitești Court of Appeal to another competent court, submitted after both the petitioner and the respondent failed to appear at the hearing. The dismissal was based on the legal finding that the procedural requirements for a transfer were not met, with the Public Ministry arguing against the transfer and the Court sustaining that the initial allocation of jurisdiction remained valid and lawful.

Keywords

AI generated
transfer of competence procedural requirement transfer rendered moot jurisdictional matters public hearing dismissal of traffic proceedings

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 124 CPC
Implied procedural basis for dismissing the motion for transfer of jurisdiction due to lack of merit or procedural defects, as no other article is explicitly cited in the dispositive.
AI generated
Încheierea nr. 663/2014
Request for transfer of jurisdiction (strămutare) of an ongoing civil case dismissed due to lack of grounds
Încheierea nr. 3631/2012
Request for transfer of jurisdiction (strămutare) of civil proceedings
Încheierea nr. 3869/2013
Civil litigation: Petition for transfer of jurisdiction (strămutare) dismissed due to failure to substantiate the request for moving the case from a suspended proceeding.
Încheierea nr. 2629/2013
Denial of jurisdictional transfer request based on non-satisfaction of legal requirements
Încheierea nr. 4402/2013
Strămutare (transfer of jurisdiction) of civil proceedings: rejection based on existing hearing schedule and lack of grounds for venue change

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
Art. 124 CPC

Implied procedural basis for dismissing the motion for transfer of jurisdiction due to lack of merit or procedural defects, as no other article is explicitly cited in the dispositive.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

S-a luat în examinare cererea de strămutare formulată de petenta D.M.

La apelul nominal nu se prezintă petenta D.M. și nici intimatul I.P.V.V.

Din partea Ministerului Public participă procurorul de ședință Ș.S.

Procedura de citare este legal îndeplinită.

Cererea a fost legal timbrată.

Magistratul asistent face raportul cauzei și arată că cererea de strămutare a fost comunicată intimaților; potrivit programului de evidență informatizată a instanțelor - ECRIS, Dosarul nr. 1845/46/2013 al Curții de Apel Pitești, care face obiectul cererii de strămutare, are termen de judecată la data de 24 martie 2014.

Reprezentanta Ministerului Public pune concluzii de respingere a cererii de strămutare.

Analizând cererea,

ÎNALTA CURTE

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

D I S P U N E

Respinge cererea formulată de petenta D.M. prin care solicită strămutarea judecării procesului civil ce formează obiectul Dosarului nr. 1845/46/2013 al Curții de Apel Pitești.

Fără cale de atac.

Pronunțată în ședință publică, astăzi 27 februarie 2014.

Procesat de GGC - LM