Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Decizia nr. 4786/2010 AI generated

Appeal lapsed for inaction; peremption terminates proceedings.

Case Number Decizia nr. 4786/2010
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome struck_off
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice (Civil Section I) declared the appeal (recurs) filed by the claimant to be perimted (lapsed) and thus irrevocably terminated the proceedings, leaving the lower appellate decision of 16 June 2004 in force. The case arose from a civil appeal challenging that appellate decision; after the court had suspended the proceedings on 3 October 2007 under Article 155¹ of the Civil Procedure Code, the case remained dormant for over a year due to the parties' inaction. On 4 May 2010, the court reinstated the case sua sponte to address the lapse. The court applied Articles 248 and 252 of the Civil Procedure Code, holding that because the parties failed to pursue the case for more than one year, the appeal was perimted as a matter of law.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 1551 C. proc. civ, art. 248 C. proc. civ, art. 252 C. proc. civ; Appeal lapsed for inaction; peremption terminates proceedings: The case arose from a civil appeal challenging that appellate decision; after the court had suspended the proceedings on 3 October 2007 under Article 155¹ of the Civil Procedure Code, the case remained dormant for over a year due to the parties' inaction. On 4 May 2010, the court reinstated the case sua sponte to address the lapse. The court applied Articles 248 and 252 of the Civil Procedure Code, holding that because the parties failed to pursue the case for more than one year, the appeal was perimted as a matter of law.

Keywords

AI generated
termination of proceedings lapse due to peremption article of civil procedure declaratory decision time limits for seeking redress standing to appeal

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 1551 C. proc. civ
Prin încheierea de la termenul de judecată din data de 03 octombrie 2007, Înalta Curte, în temeiul art. 1551 C. proc. civ., a suspendat judecarea recursului declarat de reclamanta M.F.
art. 248 C. proc. civ
Main legal basis for declaring the appeal (recurs) as perimat (extinct by lapse of time), as the case remained inactive for more than one year due to the parties' fault.
art. 252 C. proc. civ
Applied to establish the procedural effects of perimare, in relation to the verification and declaration of the perimare of the appeal.
AI generated
Decizia nr. 971/2013
Appeal lapsed by peremption for failure to prosecute; prior decision upheld
Decizia nr. 5072/2010
Appeal lapsed by peremption; vindication action dismissal confirmed.
Decizia nr. 4448/2010
Appeal on peremption affirmed; appellate proceedings declared lapsed for inactivity exceeding one year.
Decizia nr. 201/2012
Peremption of civil appeal following suspension of proceedings and lapse of one-year period
Decizia nr. 956/2025
Civil appeal extinguished by peremption after six-month procedural inactivity following suspension

Key legal questions extracted by Legislator

AI generated
Art. 248 C. proc. civ.

Main legal basis for declaring the appeal (recurs) as perimat (extinct by lapse of time), as the case remained inactive for more than one year due to the parties' fault.

Art. 252 C. proc. civ.

Applied to establish the procedural effects of perimare, in relation to the verification and declaration of the perimare of the appeal.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Deliberând asupra cauzei civile de față, constată următoarele:

Prin încheierea de la termenul de judecată din data de 03 octombrie 2007, Înalta Curte, în temeiul art. 1551 C. proc. civ., a suspendat judecarea recursului declarat de reclamanta M.F. împotriva Deciziei nr. 1360/A din 16 iunie 2004 a Curții de Apel Pitești, secția civilă.

La data de 04 mai 2010, din oficiu, cauza a fost repusă pe rol în vederea discutării perimării.

Constatând că, din vina părților, cauza a rămas în nelucrare mai mult de un an, în temeiul art. 248 C. proc. civ. raportat la art. 252 C. proc. civ., Înalta Curte va constata perimat recursul.

PENTRU ACESTE MOTIVE

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

D E C I D E

Constată perimat recursul declarat de reclamanta M.F. împotriva Deciziei nr. 1360/A din 16 iunie 2004 a Curții de Apel Pitești, secția civilă.

Irevocabilă.

Pronunțată în ședință publică, astăzi 29 septembrie 2010.

Procesat de GGC - NN