Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Încheierea nr. 7584/2012 AI generated

Change of venue petition: dismissal of civil case transfer despite defendant consent

Case Number Încheierea nr. 7584/2012
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice dismissed the petition for change of venue filed by the petitioner, ruling that the case would proceed at the original court. The dispute concerned a procedural request to transfer jurisdiction for a civil case currently pending before the Panciu Court, where the opposing party consented to the transfer but the Public Prosecutor opposed it. The court rejected the petition without examining substantive merits, relying on the procedural fact that the scheduled hearing for the main case was already set for a date subsequent to the decision, implying no immediate need for venue modification, and the ruling was rendered without appeal.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Change of venue petition: dismissal of civil case transfer despite defendant consent: Respinge cererea formulată de petenta P.M. privind strămutarea pricinii care face obiectul Dosarului nr. 3116/275/2011 al Judecătoriei Panciu.

Keywords

AI generated
civil dispute hearing of the parties lack of jurisdiction immediate dismissal withdrawal of legal petition change of precedent
AI generated
Încheierea nr. 1485/2012
Petition for change of venue dismissed where underlying civil cases were already resolved or suspended
Încheierea nr. 4329/2013
Petition for transfer of trial venue for pending civil case dismissed without appeal
Încheierea nr. 1413/2013
Request to transfer civil case venue dismissed for failure to establish grounds for change of competent court
Încheierea nr. 488/2017
Request for change of venue in a civil appeal dismissed
Încheierea nr. 4934/2012
Venue change request in civil litigation: sufficiency of grounds for transfer between courts

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Procedura de citare este legal îndeplinită.

Cererea a fost legal timbrată.

Se referă de către magistratul asistent asupra faptului că potrivit programului de evidență informatizată a instanțelor, dosarul ce face obiectul cererii de strămutare are termen de judecată la data de 14 ianuarie 2013.

Petenta P.M. solicită admiterea cererii de strămutare, conform concluziilor orale formulate.

Având cuvântul, intimata C.F. arată că este de acord cu cererea de strămutare formulată de petentă.

Procuror A.B. pune concluzii de respingere a cererii de strămutare.

Analizând cererea,

ÎNALTA CURTE

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

D I S P U N E

Respinge cererea formulată de petenta P.M. privind strămutarea pricinii care face obiectul Dosarului nr. 3116/275/2011 al Judecătoriei Panciu.

Fără cale de atac.

Pronunțată în ședință publică, astăzi 12 decembrie 2012.