Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Încheierea nr. 1782/2014 AI generated

Case transfer request rejected; jurisdiction remains with Vâlcea Tribunal.

Case Number Încheierea nr. 1782/2014
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice (Civil Section I) rejected the applicant's request to transfer the case (Dosar nr. 11129/288/2012) pending before the Vâlcea Tribunal, with no appeal available. The applicant, a company through its Vâlcea branch, sought the transfer of the case, which had been stayed on 7 May 2014 under Art. 40(2) of the Civil Procedure Code; the court found no grounds for transfer, aligning with the Public Ministry's opposition. The decision is final and leaves the original case in the Vâlcea Tribunal.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 40 alin. (2) C. proc. civ; Case transfer request rejected; jurisdiction remains with Vâlcea Tribunal: Respinge cererea formulată de petenta SC A.R.A. SA, prin sucursala Vâlcea, privind strămutarea pricinii care face obiectul Dosarului nr. 11129/288/2012 al Tribunalului Vâlcea.

Keywords

AI generated
grounds of jurisdiction Civil Procedure Code transfer rendered moot unsuccessful tender procedure decisions concerning reassignment or transfer action by staff
AI generated
ICCJ_105153
Petitioners' request to transfer civil case from Vâlcea Tribunal denied; case retained in original court.
ICCJ_99756
Transfer of case to another court denied; transfer request rejected as no legal basis shown.
ICCJ_97642
Denial of case transfer petition for lack of valid grounds challenging incumbent court jurisdiction
ICCJ_136963
Transfer of venue denied; case remains with Vâlcea Tribunal
ICCJ_105257
Case transfer request rejected, underlying dispute remains with Suceava Tribunal.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Magistratul asistent face referatul cauzei și arată că judecata cauzei în dosarul a cărui strămutare se solicită a fost suspendată la data de 7 mai 2014, în condițiile art. 40 alin. (2) C. proc. civ.

Petenta, prin consilier juridic, solicită admiterea cererii, conform motivelor formulate în scris și prezentate verbal.

Reprezentanta Ministerului Public pune concluzii de respingere a cererii de strămutare.

Analizând cererea,

ÎNALTA CURTE

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

D I S P U N E

Respinge cererea formulată de petenta SC A.R.A. SA, prin sucursala Vâlcea, privind strămutarea pricinii care face obiectul Dosarului nr. 11129/288/2012 al Tribunalului Vâlcea.

Fără cale de atac.

Pronunțată în ședință publică, astăzi 5 iunie 2014.