Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Încheierea nr. 1757/2014 AI generated

Request for transfer of venue denied as moot after underlying civil case was already resolved

Case Number Încheierea nr. 1757/2014
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Romania (RO)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The High Court of Cassation and Justice dismissed the petition for transfer of venue filed by the claimant, as the application was rendered moot by the fact that the underlying case had already been decided on May 7, 2014. The dispute concerned a procedural request to transfer a civil case from the Vaslui District Court due to alleged irregularities, but the court found no basis for intervention since the original proceedings had concluded. The decisive legal basis for the dismissal was the procedural doctrine that a transfer of venue request is inadmissible once the subject matter of the transfer (the ongoing litigation) has been finally resolved, leaving no active case to be transferred.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Request for transfer of venue denied as moot after underlying civil case was already resolved: Respinge cererea formulată de petenta SC P.E. SRL, prin care solicită strămutarea cauzei ce formează obiectul Dosarului nr. 1404/333/2013 al Judecătoriei Vaslui.

Keywords

AI generated
transfer rendered moot civil dispute right to petition procedural rights legal doctrine declining of jurisdiction
AI generated
Încheierea nr. 6068/2012
Transfer of venue request dismissed as moot after underlying civil case resolved
Încheierea nr. 4867/2012
Mootness of venue transfer request following prior resolution of the underlying civil case
Încheierea nr. 1492/2012
Transfer of venue denied as moot after underlying civil case already decided.
Încheierea nr. 6156/2012
Venue transfer denied because underlying civil case had already been finally resolved
Încheierea nr. 3587/2013
Mootness of venue transfer petition due to prior final resolution of the underlying civil case

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Se referă de magistratul asistent asupra faptului că strămutarea a fost legal timbrată, iar potrivit programului de evidență informatizată a instanțelor, dosarul a cărui strămutare se solicită a fost soluționat la data de 7 mai 2014.

Reprezentantul petentei solicită admiterea cererii de strămutare pentru motivele invocate în scris, pe care le susține și verbal.

Reprezentanta Ministerului Public pune concluzii de respingere a cererii de strămutare, ca rămasă fără obiect.

Analizând cererea,

ÎNALTA CURTE

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

D I S P U N E

Respinge cererea formulată de petenta SC P.E. SRL, prin care solicită strămutarea cauzei ce formează obiectul Dosarului nr. 1404/333/2013 al Judecătoriei Vaslui.

Fără cale de atac.

Pronunțată în ședință publică, astăzi 4 iunie 2014.